Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

Planning Report (rev 1)

of 11

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                              Lower floor – 1.5m         1.5m                           Y
   • Side (southern)
                              Upper floor – 2m           1.5m (eave)
                                                         1.5m (section of building)     PO assessment
                          Lower floor – 1.5m             2m lower                       PO assessment
   • Rear (site more than
                          Upper floor – 2m               0.9m upper (eave) + 4m to
     550m²)
                                                         wall
                              (rear boundary fronts
                              public open space)
  Soft Landscaping            20% min                    28%                            Y
  Carparking                  2 covered min              >2 covered +                   Y
                                                         2 uncovered

As indicated in the Table above, the proposal generally complies with Acceptable Outcomes with a
Performance Outcome assessment required for building setbacks.



4.2.2 Side Setback

The proposal requires some minor setback variation to the northern (Figure 4 & 5) and southern side
boundaries (Figure 3) and therefore assessed against PO9 of the Low Density Residential Zone
Code which is provided below.

PO9
Buildings and structures are designed and sited to:
    (a) provide a high level of amenity to users of the subject site and adjoining premises,
        including provision of visual and acoustic privacy and access to sunlight;
    (b) not unreasonably obstruct views or cause overlooking of private open space or habitable areas
        of adjoining premises;
    (c) provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;
    (d) preserve existing vegetation that will help buffer development;
    (e) allow for space and landscaping to be provided between buildings including adequate area at ground
        level for landscaping with trees, shrubs and outdoor living;
    (f) be consistent with the predominant character of the streetscape; and
    (g) protect the natural character and avoid adverse impacts on ecologically important areas such as
        national parks, waterways and wetlands.

It is considered the proposal complies with PO9 for the following reasons.

   •   The extent of the setback encroachments along the side boundaries very limited (eaves and
       small section of protruding wall on northern side) with a majority of the dwelling footprint
       achieving compliance.
   •   The dwelling provides a high level of visual and acoustic privacy/amenity.
   •   The proposed side boundary setbacks are consistent to that of the northern and southern
       established dwellings.
   •   The proposal still provides landscaped areas along the southern and northern areas.
   •   The encroachments are limited to sections of the building that provides visual interest through
       depth and articulation, therefore reducing building bulk.




                                                                                              Page 8 of 11
Log in to download the original file

Planning Report (rev 1).pdf · 970 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.