Council archive · source document
PART Response to Information Request · OPW11/0335
Very large file (26.7 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
11.0 MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY AGAINST TARGETS
A draft water quality monitoring program has been developed to measure the performance of
the proposed stormwater treatment. The objective of the monitoring program is to quantitatively
show whether or not the nominated water quality targets are being met.
The key water quality indicators are total suspended solids, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and
pH. Other relevant water quality parameters include microbiological parameters (faecal
coliforms, Escherichia coli), chemical and physical parameters (dissolved oxygen, turbidity), and
herbicides if they are used within the development site. The following water quality indicators
are recommended (Table 11-1):
• Microbiological: Faecal coliforms, Escherichia coli
• Physical: Biological Oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen, suspended solids, turbidity,
pH;
• Chemical: Total suspended solids, total nitrogen, total phosphorus; and
• Herbicides: If herbicides are used to control weeds on the development site, then
they should be included in the suite of water quality indicators.
Table 11-1: Summary of Test Methods for Ambient Surface Waters
Sample Preparation
Parameter Sample Analysis Method
Method
Heated persulphate
Nutrients - total SEAL AQ2 discrete analyser
digestion
E coli Membrane filtration EC Broth or EC-MUG medium
Faecal coliforms Membrane filtration M-FC Agar
Membrane electrode in Wheaton
BOD5 Incubation
Bottles
Suspended solids Membrane filtration Gravimetric
Dissolved oxygen None Membrane electrode
pH None Membrane electrode
Turbidity None Photometer
LHerbicides Solvent extraction #GC/MS
#GCMS - Gas Chromotograph/Mass Spectrometer
The existing spatial variation of key water quality indicators in the wetland adjacent to the
Noosa National Park, measured on the 10th July 2009 after a stormwater flow, was used to
identify the replication needed to represent water quality in the Constructed Wetland System
and the receiving node.
It is recommended that the water quality of the terminal wetland is represented by 9 sampling
points per sampling event (i.e. 9 spatial replicates): six from the Constructed Wetland System
and 3 more from the heath on the west of the terminal wetland (adjacent to Noosa National
Park). This sampling frequency will accommodate the spatial variation of water quality
measurements expected in the Constructed Wetland System, and in the heath that connects
with Noosa National Park, and will quantitatively show the difference between the average
measured concentrations in the Constructed Wetland System and the receiving waters,
compared with the required target or guideline values.
The recommended sample points are indicated in Table 11-2, which lists the location of sample
points during the construction phase and the operational phase.
©2012 Simmonds & Bristow Pty Ltd Contrast Constructions J-1005-310 - 13 January 2012
I \CLIENTFILES\Contrast Constructions\1108-155c - Essence of Peregian SCEP Stage 1 Update\09_Output Documents\1108-155C_SWMP
SCEMP_Scanlon Property Group V3.0_ta_120113.doc Page 18 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PART Response to Information RequestRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 26.7 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.