Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 13 of 25
RISKS %
1. Asset deterioration and structural failure; Asset condition
2. Contributed assets not meeting the The level of confidence in asset condition data for
required levels of service or being fit for buildings and facilities infrastructure is very low. The
: current asset conditions utilised in this plan are
poloem, wid : : determined on an “aged based” calculation and
3. Buildings and facilities not compliant with therefore do not reflect their true physical condition.
current regulations and standards;
4. Disaster events such as fire, flood and, In addition to using a “desktop” based calculation to
storm: determine the asset condition, there will also be
5 Mali 5 Macks h denies inaccuracies due to factors which may further
: Penns See ee ae Sane understate the actual condition of buildings and
and facilities assets. The condition profile reflected in the
6. A lack of condition knowledge across the adjacent graph indicates that, generally, assets are
network contributing to __ ill-informed not that old and only a small number of assets are
decisions. close to the end of their expected life.
The first major improvement in asset management
activities for this asset class is to undertake physical
= asset condition assessments. Once this is completed,
o - .
S Hr a mofe detailed assessment of future renewal
a Age Based Condition investments Cambe made and integrated into
g Profile financial planning.
o
= The physical condition assessments commenced in
g9,000 early 2015 and the resultsiof these condition
30,000 assessments, will be compiled,within the asset
& system to’ assist in developing maintenance and
= 0,000 renewal programs into the future.
“10,000
0 i Assessment
1 2 3 4 5 [EET OEP ToT
4 Very Good Condition
Condition Rating Only normal mainetnance required
2 Minor Defects Only
Minor maintenance required (5%)
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
= 7 3 Level of Service
Significant maintenance required (10-20%)
Asset renewal 4 Requires Renewal
nr 2 oo : Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
Although existing renewal activities are primarily as | 5 Asset Unserviceable
a result of asset failure and defectidetection, the Over 50% of Asset requires replacement 4
development of arenewal programme will improve The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
a sti ata i nti management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the |IMM,
the capability of predicting appropriate intervention International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
timeframes. for the majority of Council's infrastructure until more advanced
asset management practices are considered.
There are no major (greater than $500k) renewals
proposed for buildings and facilities assets in the
current 5 year capital programme.
Improvement Plan
1. Finalise physical asset condition assessments across all buildings and facilities assets;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
4 deterioration modelling;
7 4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to libraries, in more detail.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
“Set iD: 199618: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 13 of 25See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.