Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda

of 25

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Page 21 of 25

RISKS                                                                     dit
       1.  Asset deterioration and structural failure;             Asset condition
       2.  Poor construction techniques and inferior               The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
          raatorate:                                               roads and carparks is moderate after the recent road
                 et                     ;           ;              condition survey of the road network. The initial
       3.  Contributed iegteies not meeting the required           results indicate that road pavements are performing
           levels of service or fit for purpose;                   well and have an overall health check of 8 out of 10.
       4.  Lack of detailed condition knowledge across             While this is based on the modelling parameters from
           our road network contributing to ill-informed           the PMS further analysis and developmentis
           daricions                                               required to complement the agreed level of service. It
                     P                                             should be noted that the condition profile in the below
                                                                   graph does represent the results similar to the sealed
                                                                   road pavement condition survey recently conducted.
                                                                   To further improve the condition data for other asset
                                                                   classes not held in the PMS, utilising the 1 to 5
        Asset renewal                                              ratings will be required. This will result in the ability to
                       as ps             a ag8                     develop  a |   term ren     | programme for each
        Although the existing renewal activities are a             Sia             ey ae                         er
        result of asset failure and defect detection, the                     Sian Octet: atmemetan heakiet ate Ccadien
        development of a reseal and rehabilitation
        program is critical to ensure there are sustainable                      Very Good      ee
        investments in the road and carpark network.                          1  Only normal mainetnance required
                                                                              >  Minor Defects Only
                                                                                  Minor maintenance required (5%)
        A road pavement management system (PMS)                                   Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
                  ;        i               ii                                 3   Level of Service
        has been in place since 2002, providing                                   aon   aoa      requved (16-20%)
        information and guidance for road surfacing and                       4   Requires Renewal
        road pavement improvements. The PMS models                                pe     Fence FARGO 12) 30%)
        asset deterioration and determines the optimum                        5  Over 60% of Asset requires replacement 5
        intervention times for renewing assets. The data           The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
                             j         ing i                       management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
        has sien ao     daha a 7  ene     a ee                     International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
       pro: uce an   model a ~ to   year reseal an                 for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
        rehabilitation program. Council currently allocates
        $6.8m towards renewal projects for roads and
        carpark assets.
        While the PMS caters for our sealed road                       y
        pavement we must still do physical condition                   7c                               +I
        assessments on the remainder of infrastructure                 . Aged Based Condition
        such as carparks, road furniture, signage and                  “9              Pr fil
        traffic calming devices. The establishment of                  = 5.                OMe
        annual renewal programs for these assets                       o
        classes is essential in the development of                     5    500,000
        sustainable asset management practices within                  2               B     os
        our organisation.                                                         0                =           =
                                                                                        1    2     3     4     5
                                                                                        Condition Rating

       Improvement Plan
           1.  Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across roads and carpark infrastructure with results and overall
               asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in the asset system;
          2.   Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
              within the asset system;
          3.   Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset deterioration
               modelling;
          4.   Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
   7          specific to carparks, signs, road furniture and traffic calming devices, in more detail.
-         5. Further develop the Pavement Management System to improve the level of confidence in reseal and
               rehabilitation programmes.

       NOOSA COUNCIL                    PO Box 141                      P. (07) 5329 6500          [email protected]
         Set ID: 1996718.               TEWANTIN QLD 4565               F. (07) 5329 6501          www.noosa.qld.gov.au

                                                                                                            Page 21 of 25
Log in to download the original file

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda(PDF, 5MB).pdf · 5.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.