Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 25 of 25
RISKS
1. i li 2 “4:
Environmental compliance, es Asset condition
2. Poor construction techniques and _ inferior : 2
wee The level of confidence in asset condition for waste
materials; : ;
: : ; infrastructure is deemed to be low. The current asset
3. Disaster events such as flooding, storm; conditions utilised in this plan are determined on an
4. A lack of condition knowledge across the “aged based” calculation and therefore do not reflect
network contributing to ill-informed decisions. their true physical condition.
The condition profile reflected in the graph below
indicates that generally assets are not old and only a
small number of assets are getting close to the end of
their expected life.
The first improvement in condition data is to record
the 1 to 5 ratings of all waste assets and record
Asset renewal results within the asset system.
Although the majority of current renewal activities
are a result of asset failure and defect detection, Assessment
j [ETT (OTST eLeTeeO
the development ofa renewal programme will an Gee
improve the capability of predicting suitable Es deticromnt nisabbinca reaieed
intervention timeframes before asset failures. 2 Minor Defects Only —
Minor maintenance required (5%)
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
There is currently a project for the renewal of the 3 Geena ec
weighbridge infrastructure and the entrance to Fs oon = ee or ;
the landfill in the current 5 year capital Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
Asset Unserviceable
programme. > | Gvar:50% (of Ascot. requitee.roplacemént j
The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
In addition to the depreciation of existing assets, management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
a “Waste Provisions Fund’ to meet the costs of International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
‘ ‘ : * é for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
future major work is available. This fund is
intended for items such as final capping and 30
years site maintenance after the landfill is closed.
It also applies to current closed sites that require
ongoing works. This funding is built into current :
charges and set aside in a fund for the future. 8 P= +4
This fund will-be further developed and 2 Age Based Condition
considered with the next generation asset s ‘
management plans and long term financial plans. s Profi le
@
The development of a cyclical condition 210,000
assessment for waste assets will be the first step z
in the development of a long term renewal = 5 000
programme. é .
0 a cae
Céndition Rating” ?
Improvement Plan
1. Formalise and implement cyclical inspections across all waste assets with results recorded in the asset
system;
‘2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and inspection data to have a single point of truth for waste
assets within the asset system;
3. Develop along term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
F deterioration modelling;
. 4, Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to waste buildings, leachate and stormwater systems, landfill cells, weighbridges and roads.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
r Set iD: 199613; TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 25 of 25See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.