Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda

of 25

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Page 25 of 25

RISKS
       1.      i               li     2                                             “4:
           Environmental compliance,              es                Asset condition
       2.  Poor construction techniques      and _ inferior                                 :            2
                 wee                                                The level of confidence in asset condition for waste
           materials;                                               :             ;
             :                           :         ;                infrastructure is deemed to be low. The current asset
       3.  Disaster events such as flooding, storm;                 conditions utilised in this plan are determined on an
       4.  A lack of condition knowledge across the                 “aged based” calculation and therefore do not reflect
           network contributing to ill-informed decisions.          their true physical condition.
                                                                    The condition profile reflected in the graph below
                                                                    indicates that generally assets are not old and only a
                                                                    small number of assets are getting close to the end of
                                                                    their expected life.
                                                                    The first improvement in condition data is to record
                                                                    the 1 to 5 ratings of all waste assets and record
       Asset renewal                                                results within the asset system.
       Although the majority of current renewal activities
        are a result of asset failure and defect detection,                                Assessment
                                                    j                      [ETT   (OTST eLeTeeO
       the development ofa renewal programme will                                  an Gee
        improve the capability of predicting suitable                          Es deticromnt nisabbinca reaieed
        intervention timeframes before asset failures.                         2   Minor Defects Only —
                                                                                   Minor maintenance required (5%)
                                                                                   Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
       There is currently a project for the renewal of the                     3   Geena               ec
       weighbridge infrastructure and the entrance to                          Fs  oon = ee       or        ;
       the landfill in the current 5 year capital                                  Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
                                                                                  Asset Unserviceable
        programme.                                                             > | Gvar:50% (of Ascot. requitee.roplacemént j
                                                                    The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
        In addition to the depreciation of existing assets,         management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
        a “Waste Provisions Fund’ to meet the costs of              International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
                 ‘        ‘     :        *      é                   for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
        future major work is available. This fund is
        intended for items such as final capping and 30
       years site maintenance after the landfill is closed.
        It also applies to current closed sites that require
        ongoing works. This funding is built into current                :
        charges and set aside in a fund for the future.                 8                               P= +4
       This fund will-be further developed and                          2    Age Based Condition
        considered with the next generation asset                       s                       ‘
        management plans and long term financial plans.                  s               Profi le
                                                                         @
       The development of a cyclical condition                           210,000
        assessment for waste assets will be the first step               z
        in the development of a long term renewal                        = 5 000
        programme.                                                       é  .
                                                                               0            a      cae
                                                                                           Céndition Rating”     ?

       Improvement Plan
           1.  Formalise and implement cyclical inspections across all waste assets with results recorded in the asset
               system;
          ‘2.  Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and inspection data to have a single point of truth for waste
               assets within the asset system;
           3.  Develop along term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
   F           deterioration modelling;
.          4,  Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
               specific to waste buildings, leachate and stormwater systems, landfill cells, weighbridges and roads.

       NOOSA COUNCIL                     PO Box 141                     P. (07) 5329 6500          [email protected]
        r Set iD: 199613;                TEWANTIN QLD 4565              F. (07) 5329 6501          www.noosa.qld.gov.au

                                                                                                             Page 25 of 25
Log in to download the original file

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda(PDF, 5MB).pdf · 5.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.