Council archive · source document
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report · MCU20/0026
Project No. 1-22543 Page | 23 June, 2020 Ref: 1-22543, 2020-05-20, BR SSA VER 1 Sanya Holdings – Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical Report - Proposed Residence, 40 Park Crescent, Sunshine Beach 6.3 Basement Excavation and Retention Methods 6.3.1 Introduction The design and construction method adopted for basement retention depends upon a number of factors. These include:- Strength and type of subsurface. Boundary conditions i.e. location and type (i.e. movement sensitivity) of nearby building, need for underpinning, etc. Final wall profile and need for waterproofing. 6.3.2 Geotechnical Model Based on the supplied contour plan, the existing ground elevation varies from approximately RL 27.0m at the western corner of the site down to approximately RL 16.0m at the eastern corner of the site. Assuming a basement (ground floor) excavation level of approx. RL 19.0m, the overall cuts on the site will vary from 0m up to approximately 5.0m (i.e. basement excavation is in from the boundary lines on the high side of the site). Drilling, DCP testing carried out and a site inspection indicate a consistent subsurface profile with very loose to loose sands to approx. 2.5m depth, transitioning to medium dense to dense sands extending to the base of the proposed cuts. 6.3.3 Boundary Conditions Boundary conditions for each face consist of:- South Western Face – Park Crescent with underground services (council services, water, comms, power). North Eastern Face – Adjoining council easement. North Western Face – Approx. 2m wide service easement then neighbouring two storey residential property approx. on the easement boundary. South Eastern Face – Neighbouring three storey residential property, approx. 2.0m off the boundary line, with block retaining walls along parts of the boundary line. The effect of these boundary conditions must be taken into account in the design of a suitable retention option for the south western, north western and south eastern boundary lines. 6.3.4 Possible Retention Options The following options could be considered for temporary basement retention along the three site boundaries noted above:- 1) Batter slope to stable batter angle - This method is only applicable where sufficient space is available. Batters could be utilised where space allows within the site, however given the adjoining properties on all sides and predominantly loose sand profile, this would not be possible or recommended. 2) Structural Solution - This method includes the construction of retention systems (temporary or permanent) along the boundaries to support the material on the SOIL SURVEYS
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.