Council archive · source document
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report · MCU20/0026
Project No. 1-22543 Page | 24 June, 2020 Ref: 1-22543, 2020-05-20, BR SSA VER 1 Sanya Holdings – Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical Report - Proposed Residence, 40 Park Crescent, Sunshine Beach neighbouring properties and road. Given that the excavation is expected to be up to 5m deep overall, a braced retaining wall will be required. This retaining wall should be installed prior to excavation to ensure stability of the sand profile. Several types of retaining walls could be employed including steel sheet piles, contiguous CFA piles or diaphragm wall. Each of these have relative advantages and disadvantages (technical and economic) which are best evaluated at the detailed design/tender stage. Once the preferred retention option for the site boundaries has been selected, SSE should be contacted to provide further design detail (if required). 6.4 Retaining Walls 6.4.1 General It is understood that retaining walls will be required for parts of the site. The lateral earth pressure distribution that affects the retaining walls on the site will depend upon the following parameters:- In-situ and backfill material properties Design water regime at the rear of the wall Wall and cut geometry Surcharges affecting the wall Wall type The structural bracing of the wall and the timing of backfilling behind the wall 6.4.2 Pressure Distribution The following situations should be considered:- For cantilever walls, which allow some movement at the top, (i.e. at least 0.005H in clays) the active case (Ka) applies with a triangular distribution in both the short and long term situations. For cantilever walls which cannot tolerate this movement, the at rest case (Ko) applies with a triangular distribution in both the short and long term situations. For structurally braced walls the wall design should be checked for both a trapezoidal (clay soils - short term conditions) and triangular distribution with Ko values (long term conditions). The pressure distributions as referred to above are shown in Figures 5 and 6. The parameters selected for use in the figures are dependent on the preconstruction geometry of the face being retained. It is expected that without battering, the earth parameters will control. The lateral pressure distributions shown in Figures 5 and 6 include hydrostatic pressure and show typical pressure distributions due to surcharge loadings. It is recommended that where the retaining walls are expected to be surcharged (e.g. by footings, traffic loads, sloping ground surface, etc.) Soil Surveys Engineering should be contacted to provide a recommended lateral earth pressure distribution. SOIL SURVEYS
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
RFI - Attachment C - Slope Stability Assessment and Geotechnical report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.