Attachment C - Transport Engineering Response · MCU24/0112

The situation in this townhouse development is not unusual in a residential multiple dwelling context,
even without the additional measures provided by Blight Rayner. Our risk assessment in line the
DTMR guidance has shown low risk scores. Urbis are comfortable that the proposal constitutes a safe
and acceptable design for pedestrians.




      (2) Provide dimensions for the third car space for units A and D and demonstrate that
          the space is suitable for a ‘small car’, as described in AS2890.1:2004 (2.4.1(a)(iii))

Urbis Response:
Swept path analysis has been conducted the on the proposed plans to determine the viability of the
third small parking space in units A and D. A B50 small car vehicle with 4.45m x 1.66m dimensions
was used in the tests of the allocated parking space and driveway manoeuvring.
Australian Standards AS2890.1:2004 Section 2.4.1(a)(iii) specifies that a small parking space should
have 5m x 2.3m dimensions. The third car spaces measure 5m x 2.3m. Appendix A SK02
demonstrates this design vehicle parked an allocated garage space complying with these dimensions.
The attached SK02 drawing also shows the manoeuvring space required for this vehicle type to
reverse entry into the allocated garage space. As can be seen in the drawings, the swept path
demonstrates there is sufficient space in front of the garages for vehicles to position before entering.
As such, no changes to the vehicle garage or driveway are proposed.




100 Hilton Tce RFI Response                                                                                4