Original source · versioned page text
Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v1 - 60 Glenridge Drive COOROIBAH
Original PDF page 18, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnBushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v1 NCES REF: J001001 Lot 47 on RP860577 – 60 Glenridge Drive, Cooroibah 4 BUSHFIRE RISK ASSESSMENT 4.1 General A bushfire risk assessment for the proposed building areas has been prepared generally in accordance with State Planning Policy – State Interest Guideline – Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience (DILGP, 2016) and AS/NZS ISO 31000:2018 – Risk Management Methodology. The bushfire risk assessment details the likelihood that the proposed development will be exposed to radiant heat impact considering the proximity to bushfire prone vegetation and likely bushfire behaviour. Plate 10 illustrates the main bushfire attack mechanisms acting on buildings. Plate 10 – Figure A 5.1 Bushfire attack mechanisms (Planning for Bush Fire Protection, 2006) According to AS/NZS ISO 31000:2018, a ‘hazard’ is defined as a source of potential harm or a situation with a potential to cause loss, whereas a ‘risk’ is the chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives measured in terms of consequences and likelihood. The State Planning Policy – State Interest Guideline – Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience (DILGP, April 2016) refers to ‘acceptable risk’, ‘tolerable risk’, and ‘intolerable risk’ which are defined below. • Acceptable risk o A risk that, following an understanding of the likelihood and consequences, is sufficiently low to require no new treatments or actions to reduce risk further. Individuals and society can live with this risk without feeling the necessity to reduce the risks any further. • Tolerable risk o A risk that, following an understanding of the likelihood and consequences, is low enough to allow the exposure to continue, and at the same time high enough to require new treatments or actions to reduce risk. Society can live with this risk but believe that as much as is reasonably practical should be done to reduce the risks further. • Intolerable risk o A risk that, following an understanding of the likelihood and consequences, is so high that it requires actions to avoid or reduce the risk. Individuals and © 2021 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.