Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Response to Further Advice Rob Friend and Associates
[21]
Table 8.2.3.3 - Criteria for assessable development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Safety of people and property
PO1 AO1.1 R1.1
Development maintains the safety of people Development which will materially increase the 1. The subject site has undergone a site-
and property from the adverse impacts of number of people living or congregating on specific bushfire hazard assessment. The
bushfire. premises, including reconfiguring a lot, is not hazardous vegetation as mapped as High
located within a medium or high bushfire potential bushfire intensity in the Noosa
hazard area. Plan Natural Hazard Overlay Mapping was
determined to be High potential bushfire
AO1.2 intensity in the site-specific inspection.
Development maximises setbacks from 2. Site specific recommendations to reduce
hazardous vegetation to achieve an the potential bushfire hazard within the
acceptable risk. subject site.
3. A Bushfire Management Plan may be
Editor’s Note — PSP8 Natural necessary to satisfy the Code in this
Hazards provides guidance for assessing instance.
bushfire hazard risk and preparing a bushfire
hazard management plan.
Impacts on Ecologically Important Areas
PO2 No acceptable outcome provided R2.1
Bushfire mitigation measures do not adversely The site does not contain any areas of
impact on: biodiversity values, connectivity of ecosystem
functioning OR natural waterways, wetland or
1. biodiversity values, connectivity and areas of native vegetation that could be
ecosystem functioning; and adversely impacted upon by bushfire mitigation
measures.
RFA17-040Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Mitigation Plan | 61 Noosa Springs Dr. Noosa Heads 30 April 2022
Rob Friend & Associates Pty Ltd
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.