PM Submission - Thomas Kearney - MCU18/0015

Point 3. See comments for Point 2.



Points 4 to 9 incl. The report should be revised to address all of the issues raised by Rod
Jeffery.



Point 10. The report is insufficiently stringent in its analysis of the site risks.



Point 11. As previously advised, I also am firmly of the same opinion — only the most thorough
and comprehensive quality control measures (including by a supervising Geotech. engineer)
would need to be put in place and the owner of 34 Edgar Bennet Avenue would be best advised
to have his own certifying agent in place to independently verify the works. Business-as-usual
construction would be potentially disastrous for such a project, both for the project itself and in
terms of its potential impact on 34 Edgar Bennet Avenue.



Point 12. Noted

Point 13. Noted



Point 14. 34 Edgar Bennet Avenue is uphill from and immediately adjacent to the proposed
development at 27 Attunga Heights and therefore warrants submission of concern.



I trust the above comments capture the issues. Any queries, don't hesitate to call or email.

Kind regards

Paul