Original source · versioned page text
2014-11-20 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 20 NOVEMBER 2014
a. Where is considered effective and practical all roof runoffs should be directed to
water tanks with overflows and surcharge be discharged into a lawful point of
discharge.
b. Stormwater detention to cater for all flows from the outdoor areas and any
possible stormwater surcharge from the roof drainage system during heavy
rainfall events to maintain predevelopment stormwater runoff, and to address
any potential of adverse impact by the development on the existing drainage
conditions on other properties.
c. Plans submitted for operational works approval must include bioretention which
demonstrates that stormwater runoff shall be treated to achieve 80% Reduction
in Total Suspended Solids, 60% Reduction in Total Phosphorous and 45%
Reduction in Total Nitrogen prior to discharge from the site compared to if there
was no water pollutant mitigation incorporated into the design.
d. Where biobasins are proposed on site to achieve compliance with the above
Reduction parameters, calculations to determine filter media area and detail
design must be consistent with current best practice methods as detailed in the
Bioretention Technical Design Guidelines Version 1, October 2012.
e. Bioretention basins must include 1:4 batters between the dedicated filter media
area and the surrounding ground surface. Batters are not included within filter
media footprint area calculation.
f. Bioretention basin layout and setting must be consistent with landscape design
for the site.
15. Stormwater runoff from the development must be disposed of on-site without causing
scour or damage to the subject site or any adjoining property.
Advisory Notes
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan
and/or obtain approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (ACH
Act).
The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that: “A
person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures
to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage”. It is an offence to
fail to comply with the duty of care. Substantial monetary penalties may apply to
individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care. Injunctions may also be issued
by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the ACH Act can
also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal
cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage. You
should contact the Cultural Heritage Co-ordination Unit on 07 3238 3838 to discuss
any obligations under the ACH Act.
Equitable Access and Facilities
The plans for the proposed building work have NOT been assessed for compliance
with the requirements of the National Construction Code - Building Code of Australia
(Volume 1) as they relate to people with disabilities. Your attention is also directed to
the fact that in addition to the requirements of the National Construction Code as they
relate to people with disabilities, one or more of the following may impact on the
proposed building work:
1 the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Commonwealth);
2 the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Queensland); and
3 the Disability (Access to Premises – Buildings) Standards.
Noosa Shire Council Page 10 of 19
This is not an official copy of Council’s Minutes
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.