Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Traffic Engineering Correspondence

Attached to the e-mail Response to Council information request - MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133 - email 2 of 3.

of 34

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

           Figure 3 shows the estimated 2029 PM traffic movements at the Myall Street/Holts Road intersection based
           on these changes.

opment                                              2029    Estimated Peak Hour Volumes Including Proposed Development
a k Hour                                                                                      Weekda y PM Pea k Hour



                                   502      417                                            633
                    Myall Street            85                                                        Myall Street
                                                                                144
                                   186                                           92        236


                                                     42    215


                                                     258                177
                                                           Holts Road




           Figure 3: Estimated 2029 PM Movements at Myall Street/Holts Road – Scenario 3




           Scenario 4: Gap Acceptance and Follow Up Headway of 6 seconds and 3.5 seconds respectively

           In this scenario, the Sidra default critical gap acceptance will be reduced from 7 and 4 seconds respectively to
           6 and 3.5 seconds respectively. These values are still higher than identified in Austroads Guidelines and the
           Sidra User Guide for a two lane two way road. Whilst applying these alternative values, the following input
           data is still considered to be conservative:

                   Heavy vehicle percentage;
                   Traffic growth rates;
                   Base traffic volumes;
                   Traffic generation of industrial land use;
                   Fast food traffic generation; and
                   Shared trips.

           Scenario 5: All Alternative Values in Table 1

           In this scenario all alternative values from Table 1 will be used, including:

                   a critical gap acceptance and follow up headway of 6 seconds and 3.5 seconds respectively; and
                   2014 base volumes for the ‘upgrade option’;
                   0.4vph/100m2 GFA for industrial traffic; and
                   15% shared trips for fast food and service station traffic.
Log in to download the original file

Traffic Engineering Correspondence.pdf · 2.9 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.