Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
However, the developer was not satisfied with what he had agreed to and in
2011 went back to the Planning and Environment Court to vary his agreed
plans.
The development which the developer had had approved by the Planning and
Environment Court on 24 January 2012 was not economically viable.
Apparently the developer was unable to sell any of the “beach shacks” off the
plan and the proposed mini-supermarket, approved as part of that approval,
was physically non-viable. With no pre-commitment the developer did not
proceed.
Subsequently, in 2013 the developer submitted a new development application
(for the area where the commercial building was approved) for a supermarket
and four specialty shops, this time, after discussion with the Peregian Beach
community. This proposal, was supported by PBCAI and the Peregian Beach
community and was approved by Noosa Council on 29 May 2014. It was a
significant improvement on what the developer had previously had approved.
The IGA Supermarket and the four specialty shops (the IGA supermarket
development) which was subsequently built is a positive benefit to Peregian
Beach.
2. The Current Development Application
The balance of the caravan park site, after the IGA supermarket development, is
what the developer is currently seeking approval to develop.
Here it is important to reiterate the written advice to the pre-lodgement
meeting held on 14 December 2016 (between Council and the developer):
The Open Space Recreation zone in Peregian Beach specifically seeks to
protect and retain the site for low cost visitor accommodation needs
reflective of the site’s previous use as a caravan park, but also acknowledges
that a range of visitor accommodation may be provided where integrated
with budget accommodation. There is no support given to permanent
residents on the site.
It is noted that the current approval included only visitor accommodation,
with no permanent resident accommodation proposed. This approved
development was supported by Council through an appeal process as it was
acknowledged that it included low to mid cost visitor accommodation being
a reasonable alternative to the Planning Scheme’s intent to retain the
caravan park.
It is considered the current proposal does not meet the Planning Scheme’s
intent for the site as there is a lack of and a limited range of visitor
accommodation proposed…….
The DA does not reflect this advice.
Document Set ID: 20308173
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 126 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.