Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
The other thing to mention here is the Planning and Environment Court
sanctioned approval of 12 February 2010 of the now lapsed DA referred to
above. At item 3 it stated:
The units shall operate in accordance with the defined use of ‘Visitor
accommodation – Type 4 Conventional’ in the Noosa Plan, which provides
for short term visitor accommodation. The units shall not be used for the
purpose of permanent residential accommodation, with the exception of two
manager/caretaker’s units. The Community Management Statement for any
or all Bodies Corporate having control of the development, or any part
thereof, shall incorporate this requirement.”
The DA is totally in conflict with this approval as can be seen below:
The proposal:
Multiple Housing of 3 types – 88 Beds (or Persons)
They are all proposed for PERMANENT RESIDENTS.
The Kamala & Marram Houses (in the centre of the ring road) There are
9 of these with 3 bedrooms. (27 persons). Carparking is 9x2. Estimated
price $825K
The Wallum Units (along Rufous Lane). There are 7 of these with 3
bedrooms. (21 persons). Carparking is 5x3 and 2x2. Estimated price
$725-800K
Reed Beach Houses (behind the Hotel) – There are 10 of these with 4
bedrooms upstairs and living down. (40 persons). Carparking is 10x3.
These units will be approximately 6m below the Hotel level. Estimated
price $850K.
Essence Hotel/(Motel) & Conference Centre – 40 beds
The developer proposes to develop and run the hotel with 20 visitor
accommodation rooms and 12 apartments (4 x 1 bedroom and 8 x 2
bedroom) which are described as “multiple and visitor”. (40 persons).
The 12 apartments are proposed for PERMANENT RESIDENTS.
The Hotel will apparently employ 15 people (full-time and part-time)
including conference facilitators. The Conference room is small and
apparently will seat 40. 40 Car parks are proposed with all bar 3 (Visitor
parking?) under the Hotel and behind a security gate.
3. Lack of compliance with the Noosa Plan
PBCAI’s Objection to the DA is firstly based on its lack of compliance with the
Noosa Plan Open Space Recreation zone requirements. PBCAI specifically seeks
to protect and retain the site for low cost visitor accommodation reflective of
the site’s previous use as a caravan park.
The Noosa Plan resulted from a community consultation process and was
subsequently approved by the State Government. It should not lightly be
ignored by a developer being granted an approval which significantly conflicts
with the Plan.
Document Set ID: 20308173
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Darren Tindale - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 126 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.