Original source · versioned page text
2014-01-20 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 20 JANUARY 2014
COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT
6.4. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR SHOPPING
CENTRE AT 5-7 RUFOUS STREET, PEREGIAN BEACH – PLANNING &
ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL (MULTISPAN) – MCU13/0092
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
File No MCU13/0092
Author Coordinator, Development Assessment
SUMMARY/PURPOSE
The purpose of the report is to seek Council’s position on defending an appeal against a ‘deemed
refusal’ of an application for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use (Entertainment
and Dining Business Type 1 - Food & Beverages, Commercial Type 1 – Office, and Retail
Business Type 2 – Shop & Salon) situated at 5-7 Rufous Street, Peregian Beach (Peregian
Beach Bowls Club).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The application seeks to develop a shopping centre for Peregian Beach, comprising a 1,100m2
supermarket and 8 specialty shops, restaurants and/or offices of 750m2. Access is proposed via
Rufous Street, with parking on site proposed for 100 cars.
A report was included on the Sunshine Coast Council’s Ordinary Meeting Agenda for the 14
November 2013. The report provided an assessment of the proposed development against The
Noosa Plan and the submissions received and recommended refusal of the application on the
following grounds:
1. The proposed development does not comply with the Overall Outcomes of The Noosa
Plan’s Eastern Beaches Locality, Business Uses, Community Uses, Driveways and
Carparking, and Transport, Roads & Drainage Codes
2. The proposed development would effectively form a second shopping centre at Peregian
Beach, is likely to adversely impact on the role and function of the Peregian Beach village
and presents a poor unappealing urban design outcome
3. The proposal will alienate land intended for open space recreation purposes and the
applicant has not demonstrated that the community would not be disadvantaged by the
loss of open space recreation land
4. The development would have unacceptable impacts on traffic operations and traffic safety
at the intersection of Woodland Drive and David Low Way, and in Rufous Street
5. Traffic generated by the development proposed would have significant adverse impacts on
the amenity of existing residences nearby and
6. The proposed development raises significant conflicts with The Noosa Plan and there are
insufficient grounds to justify the conflict with planning scheme.
Page 10 of 86
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.