2014-01-20 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA   20 JANUARY 2014




                             Page 32 of 86

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                            20 JANUARY 2014

   ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                             14 NOVEMBER 2013

   issues                                     Comments
    - The duplication of retail uses would
      severely impact the economic viability of
      the current traders within Peregian
      Village and provide no net economic
      benefit.
    - The reported job creation of the
      proposed development is misleading, as
      their will be job losses from the existing
      centre.
    Application Details                        There are no grounds for council to insist that
    - The Application was Lodged and notified | the applicant renotify the application or relodge
      in the name of Multi Span Australia Pty  the application, particularly given that
      Ltd. It did not include its ACN which itis | development approvals under the Sustainable
      mandatorily required to do under the     Planning Act 2009 are issued over the land
      Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and the    and not to a person or company.
      Corporations Act 2001. As such itis not | Notwithstanding this, the applicant provided
      a properly made application and its non- | the ACN number for the applicant on the 19
      compliance has not been waived by the | August 2013.
      assessment manager.                      In regard to the community survey
    - Voted auestons             survey were   accompanying the application, the majority of
                       .                       the responses in the survey was negative
                                               towards the proposal, and is not considered to
                                               support the applicant’s proposed grounds for
                                               approval.
    Traffic                                    Beard Traffic Engineering reviewed the
    - Proposal does not include any detail     applicant's traffic impact report and
      about external road upgrades.            subsequent roundabout design. Serious
    - The applicant has failed to justify the  concerns are raised about the safety of the
      inevitable increase in danger to existing | surrounding road network to cope with the
      motorists, pedestrians and cyclists using | additional traffic associated with the
      Rufous Street, Woodland Drive and the    development. It is also recognised there are
      David Low Way intersection.              substantial constraints regarding upgrading
    - Traffic lights for upgrading the Woodland _ | the existing network to cater for the increased
      Drive and David Low Way intersection     traffic volumes. The Noosa Plan Outcomes are
      are not acceptable.                      not supportive of traffic lights to overcome
    - Already existing carparking and traffic  these issues. The development will also
      issues within Rufous Street, with no     significantly impact the amenity and increase
      upgrades proposed.                       traffic noise on the existing residential collector
    - Woodland Drive was closed so as to       streets.
      avoid extra traffic from Peregian Springs. | The proposed design of the shopping centre is
    - Onsite manoeuvring will not work, with —_| orientated to Council’s carpark, along David
      service vehicles proposed to use the     Low Way, even though no formal access is
      same access road as patrons entering     provided. This carpark was constructed by
      the carpark and into the incoming traffic Council, using money collected by
      to the site.                             contributions in lieu for carparking
    - There is no means of regularly           requirements in the Peregian Beach Village
      monitoring shop delivery activities and  Square, and intended for use by staff of the
      would, no doubt, rely solely on nearby   village tenancies and parking for the adjacent
      residents to report infringements of     community facility.
      agreed limits.                                             .            .     .
    - Customers will park in the Council       The development will create conflicts with the
      carpark on David Low Way, which will     users of the existing community uses adjacent.

   Sunshine Coast Regional Council                              OM Agenda Page 72 of 360

                                                                                        Page 32 of 86