Council archive · source document
Sandpiper Planning Report 090915 · 132007.1181.02
Attached to the e-mail 132007.1181.02 Change to existing application.
MCU to establish Industrial Business (Type 2 Production, alteration,
Change repackaging
to Development
and repairing)
Approval
Lot 11 Gateway
Sandpiper Hastings Drive, Noosaville
St, Noosa Heads
Specific Outcomes Probable solutions Proposal
Change to Development Approval
Outcomes
Sandpiper Hastings St, Noosa Heads
hectare; population density.
Height
Complies –
O7 Buildings and other structures— S7.1 Buildings and other
The proposal meets the
a) are low rise and have a visual bulk and an structures have a maximum
Probable Solution in terms
architectural scale consistent with structures on building height of—
of the height in metres,
adjoining or nearby land; a) for the Business however, technically
b) do not exceed a maximum height of— Centre Zone–12m; or roofing the approved
b) for the Visitor Mixed pergola constitutes the
ii For the Visitor Mixed Use Zone— Use Zone— addition of a 5th storey.
A. Northern side of Hastings Street— i. Northern side of Hastings It is argued that the
• within 7m of the Hastings St alignment – 2 Street— development would have
storeys; or negligible impact on the
• balance area of site – 4 storeys with a 3 storey a) within 7m of the
bulk and scale of the built
presentation to the beach; Hastings St alignment
form in Hastings St while
– 6m;
providing greater utility for
b) balance area of site –
the visitor occupying the
15m with a 12m
penthouse apartment.
presentation to the
beach
Refer Appendix C for
Survey plans which
demonstrate the height of
the roof structure
maintaining under the
probable solution of 15m
presenting to Hastings St.
Setbacks
O8 Buildings and other structures are appropriately S8.1Buildings and Complies – The addition of
designed and sited to— structures comply with the the roof onto the approved
a) provide amenity for users of the premises as well minimum building setbacks pergola does not intrude
as preserve the visual and acoustic privacy of identified in Schedule1- into setbacks. It also
adjoining and nearby properties; Minimum Boundary presents an opportunity to
b) provide adequate distance from adjoining uses; Setbacks. limit noise and light spill
c) preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer from terrace when being
the proposed building; used.
d) allow for landscaping to be provided between
buildings;
e) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
buildings and landscape elements within the
street;
f) protect public safety and property within erosion
prone areas by ensuring such areas are
maintained largely free of development; and
g) help protect the natural character and visual
amenity of coastal areas and watercourses.
Site cover, gross floor area and plot ratio
O9 The site cover, gross floor area and plot ratio of No solution provided Complies: The addition of
buildings and other roofed structures— placing a roof and
a) results in a building scale that is compatible with protective louvres on an
surrounding development; approved structure adds
b) does not present an appearance of excessive bulk only a very marginal
18
SAN VER 090915
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Sandpiper Planning Report 090915.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.