2018-04-26 Special Meeting Agenda

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA     26 APRIL 2018


                         ATTACHMENT 2




                            Page 16 of 42

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA                                                                                                                                                            26 APRIL 2018

  STAFF REVIEW - LGIP SUBMISSIONS (6 March to 18 April 2018)                                                                                                                   ATTACHMENT 2
pene         | Recemee Pm Frereatton
  Submission      Date      Submission Details                       Staff Review                                                                                                       Staff

                8/03/2018   |The submission refers to earlier        The submission relates to the Noosaville
5	1	1	2	1	13	1908	504	138	25	87	LGIP-PIA
5	1	1	2	1	14	2058	504	64	31	96	Map
5	1	1	2	1	15	2133	504	31	25	69	8”
5	1	1	2	1	16	2180	504	82	25	96	which
5	1	1	2	1	17	2275	504	92	25	96	shows
5	1	1	2	1	18	2378	504	45	25	95	the
5	1	1	2	1	19	2434	504	156	25	96	referenced
5	1	1	2	1	20	2602	510	65	19	96	area
5	1	1	2	1	21	2678	504	61	25	96	land
5	1	1	2	1	22	2751	510	51	19	96	use
5	1	1	2	1	23	2812	510	71	19	95	zone
5	1	1	2	1	24	2895	510	34	19	96	as
5	1	1	2	1	25	3042	504	40	25	95	No
5	1	1	2	1	26	3093	504	108	31	95	change
5	1	1	2	1	27	3211	506	26	23	95	to
5	1	1	2	1	28	3248	504	45	25	95	the
4	1	1	2	2	0	483	545	2825	31	-1	
5	1	1	2	2	1	483	546	33	30	96	by
5	1	1	2	2	2	527	546	81	24	63	direct
5	1	1	2	2	3	651	545	236	31	78	|correspondence
5	1	1	2	2	4	900	545	80	25	96	made
5	1	1	2	2	5	991	547	27	23	93	to
5	1	1	2	2	6	1029	545	154	25	90	Councilon
5	1	1	2	2	7	1198	545	32	25	26	19
5	1	1	2	2	8	1285	545	140	25	0	|Attached
                                                                                Housing” under The Noosa Plan 2006.                                                                      Draft LGIP (v2) as
                  email     February 2017 in relation to review of The                                                                                                                   publicly advertised
                            Noosa Plan that commenced for the New |Under the Statutory Guideline 03/14, this draft LGIP has its base date set at mid-2014 and therefore shows the land  __|with its base date
                            Planning Scheme.                         use zoning under The Noosa Plan 2006 current at that time.                                                          mid-2014 under
                                                                                                                                                                                        the current Noosa
                            It resubmits the earlier request that a  Future changes made to land use zones would only be shown in future LGIPs updated to a new base date that would |Plan 2006.
                            change be made to the land use zoning    __|include the particular planning scheme details c urrent at that time.
                            from the current Attached
5	1	1	2	9	5	1049	834	131	31	91	Housing”
5	1	1	2	9	6	1191	836	26	23	96	to
4	1	1	2	10	0	651	875	2253	32	-1	
5	1	1	2	10	1	651	876	179	31	80	“Community
5	1	1	2	10	2	841	875	138	25	82	Services
                                                  for a particular   This submission does not relate to any LGIP issue under the current Noosa Plan 2006 but instead relates to a
                            area on Eumundi Noosa Rd between         proposal for drafting of the New Planing Scheme that remains a
5	1	1	2	11	18	2248	917	69	24	96	work
5	1	1	2	11	19	2328	917	23	24	96	in
5	1	1	2	11	20	2364	917	146	31	94	progress. However, the submission has
                            Headland Drive and the Good Shepherd     |been forwarded to the Strategic Planning Team managing that project for further consideration in development of the
                            Lutheran College in Noosaville.          New Planning Scheme.

       2        16/04/2018 |The submission is a request to bring     This submission relates to a future sport area proposed for Pomona identified as item 12 on LG/P-PFTI
5	1	1	2	14	27	2834	1119	90	25	96	Public
5	1	1	2	14	28	2934	1119	85	24	93	Parks
5	1	1	2	14	29	3042	1119	40	25	84	|No
5	1	1	2	14	30	3093	1119	108	31	96	change
5	1	1	2	14	31	3211	1120	26	24	95	to
5	1	1	2	14	32	3247	1119	46	24	96	the
4	1	1	2	15	0	494	1160	2814	32	-1	
5	1	1	2	15	1	494	1160	32	31	96	by
5	1	1	2	15	2	538	1160	58	25	93	mail
5	1	1	2	15	3	650	1160	109	25	0	{forward
5	1	1	2	15	4	770	1160	46	25	96	the
5	1	1	2	15	5	826	1160	87	31	96	timing
5	1	1	2	15	6	925	1160	28	25	96	of
5	1	1	2	15	7	962	1166	16	19	96	a
5	1	1	2	15	8	989	1160	84	25	96	future
5	1	1	2	15	9	1084	1162	90	29	96	sports
5	1	1	2	15	10	1184	1166	64	19	77	area
5	1	1	2	15	11	1287	1161	19	25	47	|&
5	1	1	2	15	12	1317	1161	63	25	96	LCF
5	1	1	2	15	13	1389	1161	64	31	95	Map
5	1	1	2	15	14	1464	1161	31	25	91	5”
5	1	1	2	15	15	1510	1161	52	25	96	and
5	1	1	2	15	16	1574	1161	114	25	96	detailed
5	1	1	2	15	17	1701	1161	22	24	96	in
5	1	1	2	15	18	1740	1161	91	25	95	Table
                                                                                                          15.17 - Public parks and land for community facilities schedule of works" as   Draft LGIP (v2) as
                            project proposed for the Pomona area     item Map
5	1	1	2	16	9	1444	1202	96	25	93	5/12 that is projected to occur during the 2021-2026 estimate time period. The submission also refers to |publicly advertised
                            and for new play facilities to be included |a 1993 development proposal of Coorora Creek park that did not proceed and in its current form, is a designated
                            in Cunningham Park in Pomona.            trunk district recreational park.

                                                                     Council's budget must cater for all services provided by Council which includes (but not limited to) provision of new
                                                                     infrastructure, upgrades and mainenance of existing infrastructure (for both trunk and non-trunk) and many other
                                                                     operational and community service requirements. The capital works programs must also be financially affordable and
                                                                     in this regard, Council's Finance, Asset Management and Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery deparments,
                                                                     have carefully considered the proposed timing for this and all other projects in unison.
                                                                     The provision of infrastructure also often lags desired provision due to financial and other constraints.

                                                                     Provision of new and costly infrastructure such as this, often requires multiple reviews, extensive consultation and
                                                                     careful scruitiny over a number of years before final delivery. To simply bring forward this particular project having a
                                                                     large estmated cost of $5+ million, would likely impact other project priorities planned for the shire at the current time.
                                                                     The proposed LGIP's timeframe has maintained the current PIP's timeframe and the request to bring forward the
                                                                     delivery of this proposed future sports area is therfore not supported.

                                                                     The second request for additional play facilities in Cunningham Park relates to a non-trunk local park. It is therfore
                                                                     not applicable to this LGIP for trunk infrastructure provision at the higher order district and shire wide functions.
                                                                     However, this request has been forwarded to the Infrastructure Planning, Design & Delivery deparment for their
                                                                     assessment and consideration however is not a current priority.

                                                                                                                                                                                     Page 16 of 42