Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix I - Local Planning response

of 69

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Specific outcomes                                                                               Probable solutions                 Response

                      storeys, except in Precinct E1 and E2 where                                         or
                      3 storeys and Precinct REC/MU where 1                                          e)   in all other zones—8m.
                      storey; or
               iv.    for all other zones— 2 storeys;
    c)         do not visually dominate the street or
               surrounding spaces;
    d)         preserve the amenity of surrounding land;
    e)         ensure that development responds to the site
               topography; and
    f)         are well articulated with strong horizontal and
               vertical design elements to provide an
               interesting streetscape and to complement
               landform changes and landscapes.
    Setbacks                                                  S9.1 Buildings and structures comply with                             Complies with specific outcome
    O9 Buildings and other structures are                     the setbacks identified in Schedule 1 -                               Although the setback of the current boatshed from the eastern
    appropriately designed and sited to—                      Minimum    Boundary Setbacks.                                         boundary (at approximately 2.3m) is slightly less than the
    a)    provide amenity for users of the premises as well                                                                         acceptable outcome1, there is sufficient space in this area for
                                                                                                                                    new planting to buffer and preserve the amenity of adjacent land
          as preserve the visual and acoustic amenity of
                                                                                                                                    uses (in combination with existing intervening vegetation), and
          adjoining and nearby properties;
                                                                                                                                    protect the natural character of the River.
    b)    provide adequate distance from adjoining land
          uses;
    c)    allow space for required vehicle parking;
    d)    preserve any existing vegetation that will
          buffer the proposed building;
    e)    allow for landscaping to be provided between
          buildings;
          maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
          buildings and landscape elements within the street;
    g)    avoid large areas of continuous wall planes by
          varying the building setbacks and using
          appropriate techniques to provide visual relief;
          and
    h)    help protect the natural character and visual

1
    Schedule 1 – Minimum Boundary Setbacks identifies 3m side setbacks as a probable solution S8.1



                                                                                                                                                                                    P a g e |5
Log in to download the original file

Appendix I - Local Planning response.pdf · 522 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.