Objection_Nov18 · MCU18/0015

Item 23 Page 9 Response – Provide a Bushfire Hazard Assessment which documents to
likely future risk bushfire will present to the proposed development …

>> Objection: Developer states the Bushfire Hazard Assessment “is not likely”
contradicts the Assessment and does not address Noosa Councils’s stated “likely future
risk” bushfire will present to the proposed development.

     Page 15 - 4.1 Fire History and Frequency
     This study found no indicators of prior fire. Occurrence of fire at some time has to be
     regarded as possible although unlikely, potentially coinciding with maximum fuel
     accumulation and worst case fire weather conditions.

     Page 17 - 6.2 Anticipated direction of bushfire attack
     The probability of unplanned “wildfire” attack is currently regarded as possible, or
     even likely. The potential directions of attack are from the east or north, as indicated
     in Figure 5.


Item 26 Page 9 Response to – Provide traffic assessment by suitably qualified and
experience RPEQ of the increase in traffic and its impact on the traffic flows and safety at
the intersection of Attunga Height with Viewland Drive and the intersection of Viewland
Drive with Noosa Drive, particularly during peak hours traffic.

Response – Traffic management measures and / or roadworks improvements are not
necessitated as a result of the proposed development. Advice was sought from a traffic
engineer (Q Traffic) regarding the proposed increase in traffic associated with the proposed
development. The advice received was that 12 new units only generate 10 trips in the peak
hour, equating to 1 trip every 6 minutes which is a clear negligible impact on traffic
impacts.