Objection_Nov18 · MCU18/0015

Statements from Innovative Planning Solutions, Planning Response
Response to Items (Geotechnical, Slope Stability, Ecological, Constraints Analysis)
cont

>> Objection: The cursory statement dismisses ‘traffic management measures …
are not necessitated”. However the Architectural plans identify up to 31 cars on site for
13 dwellings with a 2 car garage plus 5 visitor parks. This burden IN ADDITION to
existing traffic flow on Attunga Heights is not addressed, particularly at the intersection of
Attunga with Viewland. In addition during summer and peak holiday periods and events
(Noosa Triathlon) when large holiday vans park for extended overnight stays, there is
further impact on parking, egress and turning access which has not been addressed.


Item 27 Page 10 Response - Plans to achieve road grades below 15%.

>> Objection: The road grades and driveway do not fully achieve the requirement
to be below 15%, in some cases they MEET 15%. This is glossed-over with no mitigation
solutions.

Item 27 Page 10 Response to - Provide further details of the proposed earthworks
throughout the site including the earthworks associated with the proposed road and any
building platforms including Lots 3 + 4

>> Objection: An erroneous reference is made to Lot 4, it does not exist. Proposed
earthworks appear to be detailed for SEWER only, not for building or infrastructure.

Item 30 Page 11 Response to – Amended plans providing for a density for the Multiple
Dwellings no greater than 33.3 persons.

>> Objection: Amended plans exceed the density requirement for 33.3 with 39.6
people. The proposed plan also assumes only one person resides in each bedroom in a
three bedroom house, no couples.


Item 30 Page 11 Response to – Comply with the maximum permissible GFA for the
Multiple Dwelling aspect of the development.

>> Objection: Developer has disregarded ‘typical paramaters targeted at urban
areas’ and redefined their own GFA rules for maximum gain.