Council archive · source document
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU25 0087 (As Published) · MCU25/0087
3. CONSULTATION
3.1. Referral Agencies
Not Applicable
3.2. Internal Council Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or comment:
• Senior Development Engineer, Development Assessment
The development generally satisfies the assessable provisions of the relevant codes. A summary
of the pertinent issues is below.
Access
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing crossover and reconstruct the driveway generally
in the existing location. The alignment of the proposed crossover is non-standard, it is
recommended the works are administered through an Operational Works – Driveway Crossover.
Earthworks
The excavation for the dwelling house is considered building works.
Stormwater
A stormwater management plan has been prepared in support of the application; the proposed
discharge location and site drainage characteristics are as existing.
Landslide Hazard
A small portion of the southeastern corner of the site is affected by the moderate landslide hazard
overlay. A geotechnical investigation has been prepared by Tectonic addressing the landslide
hazard, concluding a low risk of slope instability subject to the recommendations of the report.
Conditions were provided.
3.3. Other Referrals
A coastal peer review of the proposed development was undertaken by BMT on behalf of Noosa
Council. The review confirms that the Applicant’s coastal hazard assessment prepared by Moffat
& Nichol which states an Erosion Prone Area (EPA) of 85 metres, is unlikely to be vulnerable to
coastal erosion by 2100 under an extreme event scenario.
The review therefore supports the conclusion that the proposed development will not adversely
impact coastal processes or constrain future coastal management options, and confirms
compliance with the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay requirements (PO1–PO4)
noting only minor recommendations for MN to correct figure sources and update one erosion profile
illustration.
4. CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
The proposed development generally complies with the requirements of the planning scheme and
does not raise any significant issues that cannot be addressed by reasonable and relevant
conditions. The application is therefore recommended for approval.
The report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
RECOMMENDATION
With regard to Application No MCU25/0087 for a Material Change of Use - Dwelling house situated
at 17 The Esplanade Sunshine Beach Qld 4567 and described as Lot 678 RP 48111, it is
Page 12 of 18
Document Set ID: 24546364
Version: 9, Version Date: 24/03/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU25 0087 (As Published)Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.4 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.