Council archive · source document
Minor Change Request report Natasha Ave Updates 28.08.25 · MCU21/0231.02
2. Minor Change Test
An assessment against the meaning of minor change and a response about the proposed
application is provided below. The Planning Act 2016 defines a minor change as a change
to the approval that:
It would not result in a substantially different development*;
(*In determining whether the proposed change would result in substantially different development, the assessment manager
or referral agency must consider the individual circumstances of the development, in the context of the change proposed.)
Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules set outs provisions for a substantially different development. A change
may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change results in any of the following
outlined in Table 1 below.
Table 1 - Substantially different development
Provisions of Schedule 1 of the DA Rules Response
(a) Involves a new use There are no new uses proposed onsite.
(b) results in the application applying to a new No new parcel of land is introduced.
parcel of land; or
(c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of The built form and appearance is not dramatically changing and still complies with
scale, bulk and appearance; or the relevant Noosa Plan parameters.
(d) changes the ability of the proposed There is no change to the operation of the development to operate as a multiple
development to operate as intended; or dwelling.
(e) removes a component that is integral to the The proposal will be used as a multiple dwelling.
operation of the development; or
(f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the No changes to parking or numbers of bedrooms.
transport network, such as increasing traffic to
the site; or
(g) introduces new impacts or increase the No new impacts or the severity of impacts.
severity of known impacts; or
(h) removes an incentive or offset component that Does not remove an offset or incentive components of the development.
would have balanced a negative impact of the
development; or
(i) impacts on infrastructure provisions. There are no additional impacts on infrastructure.
ii. if a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the change application is made
would not cause—
A. the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
Response: The change does not include any prohibited development.
B. referral to a referral agency, other than to the chief executive, if there were no referral agencies for the development
application; or
Response: No referral required for the development.
C. referral to extra referral agencies, other than to the chief executive; or
Response: No referral agencies are applicable to the current development.
D. a referral agency to assess the application against, or have regard to, matters prescribed by regulation under section
55(2), other than matters the referral agency must have assessed the application against, or have had regard to, when
the application was made; or
Response: The proposed change would not result in the chief executive having to consider matters additional to those
considered when the application was made.
E. public notification if public notification was not required for the development application.
Response: The original application included public notification.
Given the above, the proposed change to the existing approval is a minor change in
accordance with Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development
Assessment Rules.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Request report Natasha Ave Updates 28.08.25.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.