Minor Change Request report Natasha Ave Updates 28.08.25 · MCU21/0231.02

3. Deciding the Request
In accordance with S81 of The Planning Act 2016, Council must only consider the
information provided and any other matter considered relevant, including — all matters
Council would or may assess against or have regard to, if the change application were a
development application.
Council must only consider the statutory instrument, or other document, as in effect when
the development application for the development approval was properly made. However,
may give weight they consider appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
     (a) the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change application was made (Superseded
     Planning Scheme); or

     (b) if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the change application is made but
     before it is decided—the amended or replacement instrument or document; or

     (c) another statutory instrument—

            (i) that comes into effect after the change application is made but before it is decided; and

            (ii) that the responsible entity would have been required to consider if the instrument had been in effect when
            the development application for the development approval was properly made.




4. Assessment
Council has inspected the site as part of their compliance inspection and noted the
amendments to the screening vegetation along the western boundary, as well as the
changes between buildings K1-K3.
The changes to the podium were a result of the building classification and fire
requirements. This was noted at the pre-start meeting with Council, however this
application is for formal approval of these changes.
Furthermore, the landscaping along the western boundary is in accordance with the
approved Operational Work Plans, however additional screening has been included along
K1-3 to ensure overlooking is minimised.
These changes do not impact any of the built form parameters of The Noosa Plan.