Attach I-Prelodgement minutes

Page 2

 PLM                              Document(s)/Plan(s)                          Title
 Supporting                       14056 – SK02 1                               LAYOUT OPTION 2 – 17/12/2014
 Information                      14056 – SK01 1                               LAYOUT OPTION 1 – 17/12/2014
 (Provided by Applicant)


 4. ADVICE & INFORMATION
 Planning
 Additional Reports needed:
    • Stormwater management plan
    • Traffic impact and management plan (including demand and truck access)
    • Waste management plan
    • Noise report (addressing management of night time deliveries on existing or future
        dwellings in the vicinity)

 Design
    • Any design will need to ensure appropriate treatment to the Garnet Street frontage.
       Please provide detailed drawings/renders demonstrating integration and activation of
       the street. The design will need to protect the existing leopard trees, provide for a nil
       setback to Garnet Street, look at the changes to on-street parking, include awnings in
       accordance with The Noosa Plan requirements, provide transparent shop fronts,
       landscaping, and appropriately designed outdoor dining areas.
    • The building should be single storey on Garnett Street. It should have a traditional
       form (as much as possible) and integrate with the existing streetscape. The bulk and
       scale of the building should be consistent with its surrounds.
    • The proposal should include awnings (with timber posts if possible) to the street to
       create a positive pedestrian environment, a sheltered space with a human scale but
       be designed to retain the existing street trees.
    • The proposal should include transparent shopfront glazing to Garnett Street, the
       entrance should be easily read and address the street. Trolley bays to be located to
       the side.
    • The roof form should be compatible with Federation / Art Deco styles, generally
       concealed behind a parapet wall.
    • Signage should be minimal, located above awnings and on parapet walls. Any
       proposal should include proposed signage.
    • For Built Form Specific Outcomes please refer to 053 to 060 of the Business Centre
       Zone.
    • There was additional discussion on landscaping, with a nil landscaping setback to
       Garnet Street considered acceptable, except in front of any car parking area, where
       there shall be a 2m minimum landscape setback.
    • Need further Additional details required of about the grade differences between the
       proposed shop heights, carparking areas, loading dock and the laneway. Any changes
       in grade will need to cater for There will need to be sufficient grade between the site
       and the laneway to cater for pedestrian access, to enhance permeability of the centre.
    • There was discussion about the link between the existing IGA and this development.
    • The laneways to the rear of the site and throughout Cooroy are to provide for
       pedestrian exploration. The retention of accessibility and through links should be
       noted when designing this area of the proposal.
    • Please provide for appropriate access from the laneway to the shops. Plans will also
       need to confirm heights of the building bulk and loading areas at the laneway.
    • There was a discussion on The Noosa Plan requirement for public toilets, and that in
       this size centre, Council would not be seeking this requirement.
    • Include waste storage areas and screening from street/laneway.
    • The building is centred on top of a Unitywater sewer easement. Discuss with
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
FM6082/8-18/04/2013                                                                                                   Page 2 of 4

Page 3

           Unitywater about their requirements about building over easements and submit a
           written comment from Unitywater with the MCU application.
      •    Include details about proposed signage. These will need to meet The Noosa Plan
           requirements.
      •    Carparking 1 per 20m2 for 1st 100m2 (5) then 1 per 15m2 (80) of use area beyond.
           Also include scooter bays in accordance with PSP26 and bicycle and change
           rooms/toilets in accordance with The Noosa Plan.
      •    The layout plan should include trollies bays for the ground and basement parking
           areas. Also, a lift and/or trolley ramp between the basement and ground floor is/are
           expected to be included in the plan.
      •    The submitted plans for the MCU should include detailed field survey and plans for the
           finish levels and any necessary cross sections to show the relevant details of the
           proposal.
      •    A preliminary geotechnical assessment for the excavation and foundation works is
           recommended.
      •    Additional meetings are encouraged about the design of any building.

 Traffic
    • Articulated Vehicles (AVs) entering from Maple Street would most likely not be able to
         enter the laneway, because of the existing awning encroachments at the CBA
         tenancy, the Chinese Restaurant and power poles in Maple Street.
    • Discussions centred around allowing smaller trucks and some Heavy Rigid Vehicles
         (HRVs) down the lane (if they can fit) and restricting their movement times, so as not
         to cause a further road safety problem. This is to be addressed in the traffic impact
         and management plan. The management plan should include sweep paths of
         suggested vehicle at all critical locations along and at the entry and the exit of the
         laneway.
    • As per the other developments in the laneway, Council requires a 1.5m dedication of
         land to increase the size of the carriageway.
    • The laneway and loading areas will need to also service waste vehicles.


 5. INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES
 A request for written advice for an Infrastructure Contributions Estimate relevant to your
 proposal may be obtained for a fee of $211.

 6. FURTHER ADVICE TO BE SOUGHT
      You are advised to contact Unitywater and any relevant Queensland Government
      Agencies for their specific requirements in respect of your proposal.


 7. PLM NOTES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 Jack Lewis
 Development Planner




This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
FM6082/8-18/04/2013                                                                                                   Page 3 of 4

Page 4

This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to an
approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
FM6082/8-18/04/2013                                                                                                   Page 4 of 4