Original source · versioned page text
Subdivision Report
4.1.5 Stormwater A lawful point of discharge is located to the southeast corner of proposed Lot 2. A connection will be provided to proposed Lot 1. Further stormwater management plans can be provided as part of the stormwater management plan. 5.0 State assessment and other matters 5.1 State interests 5.1.1 Matters established in the Planning Regulation There are no relevant matters applicable to the application. 5.1.2 State Planning Policy The SPP includes assessment benchmarks that may be applicable where a local government planning scheme does not adequately reflect the SPP. The Noosa Plan 2020 appropriately integrates all SPP provisions, except for Natural Hazards, risk and resilience – coastal hazards – in part. The site is not located in the erosion prone area. 6.0 Conclusion This application seeks a Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot (1 lot into 2 lots) situated at 53 – 57 Rene Street, Noosaville. The proposal is subject to code assessment within the Medium Impact Industry Zone. The assessment finds the proposal meets the relevant Acceptable and Performance Outcomes. The Planning Act 2016 prescribes that a code assessment must be carried out only— (a) against the assessment benchmarks in a categorising instrument for the development (The Noosa Plan 2020); and (b) having regard to any matters prescribed by regulation. Council, after carrying out the assessment— (a) must decide to approve the application to the extent the development complies with all of the assessment benchmarks for the development; and (b) may decide to approve the application even if the development does not comply with some of the assessment benchmarks; and Examples— 1 An assessment manager may approve an application for development that does not comply with some of the benchmarks if the decision resolves a conflict between the benchmarks. 2 An assessment manager may approve an application for development that does not comply with some of the benchmarks if the decision resolves a conflict between the benchmarks and a referral agency’s response. (c) may impose development conditions on an approval; and Page 8 of 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.