Original source · versioned page text
L15 Add info to NC
Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0039 - Response to Information Request.
Council Reference: MCU14/0039 Our Reference: 01569 L15 NG th 8 October 2015 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Council Po Box 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 Confidential Email Transmission: [email protected] & [email protected] Original in Post: No Dear Sir/Madam RE: RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST_______________________________________ Development Application for Material Change of Use for Cultivation – Type 2 Intensive for Premises at 305 Lake Macdonald Drive, Lake Macdonald and described as Lot 1 on SP108094: MCU 14/0039 I refer to the above application and note that the applicant formally responded to Councils information nd request by correspondence dated 2 May 2015. Following submission and review of the additional information required by the information request, Council staff advised that further aspects required attention including: • Impacts on environmentally sensitive areas. Council staff raised concerns as to the planting of the crops within growbags located at ground level due to the potential for nutrients washing into the adjoining creek system. Council staff requested the applicant to examine the potential for a racking system to be utilized. The applicants’ environmental consultants have indicated that the amounts of fertilizer and pesticide used by the proposed tomato farm are substantially less than the previous turf farm use and it is a closed loop system that will not impact on the adjoining creek system. The applicant has also expanded the Flood Management Plan to address flooding of the site. The Flood Management Plan details two flood triggers that will be implemented and include visual inspections of water levels by the on site manager and the installation of a water gauge with an audible warning signal at Six Mile Creek. When the warning levels have been reached the on site manager will halt irrigation of the plants and pump the irrigation water back to the holding tank. Fresh water will then be used to flush out the growbags. This procedure therefore reduces the potential for the nutrients to be washed into the creek. This system is considered appropriate based on the low levels of nutrients used and the frequency of flood events on site. Staff have also raised concerns regarding the potential for the grow bags to washed into the nearby creek. As verbally advised, the grow bags that were washed into the creek previously were used dry grow bags that had been stockpiled for removal. The applicant has advised that used dry grow bags will not be stockpiled on the site and are to be collected in two skip bins that will be located adjacent to the greenhouse during the 2 weeks that the crops are ‘pulled out’. These skip bins will be removed after the ‘pull out’ period or earlier if required. During the growing period, the growbags are generally wet and secured to the greenhouse structure via nylon string which supports the growing tomato plants. These two conditions aid is restraining the grow bags and plants within the green house during small flood events that may affect the site. In larger more severe flood events the nylon strings may break resulting in the growbags breaking free from the greenhouse and entering the adjoining creek system.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Page 2
Following any flood event the applicant will undertake an immediate clean up and inspection of the
downstream creek area for any debris from the site as well as from upstream properties. As this is an
infrequent occurrence the approach is considered reasonable and appropriate for an agricultural use in a
rural zone.
The applicant has investigated the potential to utilise a racking system, however based on the
implementation of the above measures, considers that the proposed system will not impact on the adjoining
creek area.
• Safety and Flood Plain function
Water Technology have reviewed the Flood Management Plan and consider the best option to minimize site
flood risk is to completely evacuate the site in anticipated severe weather events. The revised Flood Impact
Assessment Report details measures to address flood management as well as detailing two refuge areas for
smaller events.
• Impacts on vegetation
The applicant agrees to remove the fill from the eastern vegetation and a separate application for operational
works will be submitted.
Please note that the flood model has been amended to reflect moving the bund away from existing
vegetation on site.
• Flood Model results
Additional information has been provided to Council with regard to the flood modeling.
• Water quality
O2 Environmental have revised their Stormwater Management Plan and indicate that a media filtration
system will be suitable for the proposal. This system is considered appropriate for the agricultural use and
the rural nature of the site and surrounds.
The applicant considers that they have now responded to Council’s requests and the Decision Making
Period has therefore commenced. We request that your Council proceeds with its assessment of the
application as soon as possible in accordance with the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.
Please contact our Sunshine Coast office if you require any further information and/or clarification.
Yours faithfully,
Nadine Gorton
Senior Planner
martoo consulting pty ltd
Enclosures:
Attachment A: Flood Management Plan amended
Attachment B: Storm water Management Plan amended