Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

Further Advice Assessment Manager MCU26 0078 · MCU26/0078

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 2.     Provide an arboricultural impact assessment (AIA) prepared by an AQF Level 5 qualified
                        arborist in accordance with AS4970 Protection of trees on development sites, including:
                        2.1. Overall tree health and calculation and mapping of Tree Protection Zones (TPZ)
                             and Structural Root Zones (SRZ) of trees to be retained within the Ann Street
                             verge.
                        2.2. Demonstrate the proposal (including earthworks and the construction of
                             driveways and footpath) will not encroach into the TPZ of trees to be retained or
                             compromise their ecological or structural integrity.
                        2.3. If encroachment is unavoidable, provide details of the extent, justification, and
                             proposed mitigation measures.
                 3.     The AIA is to include tree protection specifications and a tree protection plan, outlining
                        measures necessary to protect and manage the trees throughout all stages of the
                        development. Specifications should include fencing, signage, soil protection, and any
                        special construction techniques required.


                 Item – Site Cover and Gross Floor Area
                 It is unclear how the proposed site cover and gross floor area have been calculated, as the
                 submitted plans do not clearly identify the areas included within these calculations.
                 Information Required
                 4.     Provide gross floor area and site cover plans that clearly delineate the development’s
                        coverage and floor area in accordance with the relevant administrative terms.


                 Item - Building Height
                 The submitted plans do not provide sufficient detail to confirm the maximum building height.
                 Information Required
                 5.     Provide revised plans nominating the maximum Reduced Level (RL) of the building.


                 Item – Fencing
                 Limited fencing detail has been provided in support of the application. Front fencing treatments
                 are assessable, please revise plans accordingly, or otherwise acknowledge compliance will
                 be conditioned.
                 3.     DUE DATE FOR RESPONSE TO FURTHER ADVICE

                 Council seeks your agreement to stop the current period in accordance with section 32 of the
                 Development Assessment Rules.
                 Email your response to [email protected].     OTHER DETAILS

                 Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact
                 me on the number above.
                 Yours faithfully,

                 Georgina Schramm
                 Senior Development Planner | Development Assessment
                 Development & Regulation



                                                                                                          Page 2 of 2
Document Set ID: 25153753
Version: 3, Version Date: 09/09/2026

Used in these records

About this file

File size
91 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Further Advice Assessment Manager MCU26 0078.pdf · 91 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.