Original source · versioned page text
Reference Document - MCU24/0143 (As Published)
Table 2: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Assessed
Hazard Likelihood Consequence Comments
Risk
The landslide down slope from the
northern cabin is Unlikely to regress up
slope to a point where it would impact the
structure over the expected design life of
about 50 years. This is due to the lack of
regression of the slide observed following
recent heavy and prolonged rainfall,
Relatively shallow landslide
together with the favourable natural
through fill, natural soils
topography which would limit the spread
and/or upper, fractured Unlikely Minor Low
and up slope movement of the slide.
phyllite impacting the tiny
Based on the expected cost to relocate the
homes
tiny home in the unlikely event that the
landslide regresses close to the structure,
the consequence of such a failure would
be Minor. The resultant risk from this
hazard is therefore assessed as being Low
with respect to property as per the risk
matrix given in AGS 2007.
Considering the strength of these deeper
strata and relatively light loads imposed by
the structures, subject to implementation
Deep-seated landslide
of the recommendations in Section 4, it is
through deeper, less
Rare Minor Very Low considered Rare that a deep-seated
weathered phyllite impacting
landslide would develop and impact the
the tiny homes
buildings over the design life. Given a
potential Minor impact, the resultant risk
would be Very Low as per AGS 2007.
4. Recommendations
General recommendations to help maintain the stability of the site are given in the document Some
Guidelines for Hillside Construction, which is attached.
Based on the results of the geotechnical investigation and our site observations, it is assessed that a Low
Risk of global slope instability could be achieved for the tiny homes, subject to the following:
The existing drainage system should be assessed by a civil/hydraulic RPEQ and, if necessary, the
drainage system should be upgraded to ensure that stormwater is directed away from the existing
structures, embankments and effluent disposal areas. For the northern tiny home, we consider that
this should comprise excavation of a shallow swale (say around 300 mm deep) around the northern
and western sides of the pad, graded at 1V:100H (minimum) to discharge into the existing piped
culvert to the south. Soil won from the swale excavation could be used to form a low height bund
(say 300 mm high) along the crest of the fill batter on the eastern side of the tiny home to prevent
overtopping during storm events.
All excess stormwater collected around the cabin area must be directed by pipes or surface channels
(e.g. turfed or rock lined ‘dry creek’ beds) to discharge at least 10 m downslope of any structure,
effluent disposal area or embankment, and not towards the landslide. A surface dissipation device
such as rock weir or rock lined contour drain must be installed at the stormwater outlet(s).
No additional surcharge loads, including filling and landscaping, are permitted across the ground
surface around the tiny home area.
4 June 2025
24378-001-Rev1 11 of 12
Document Set ID: 24125427
24010296
Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2025
07/08/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (Reference Document - MCU24_0143 (As Published).pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.