Council archive · source document
Planning Statement · 51987.2898.03
Attached to the e-mail Change to DA (TPC 1971) - Alt & Adds to Dwelling - 51987.2898.03.
line except—
a)uncovered and unenclosed
cantilevered balconies that do not
extend greater than 3m seaward
of the coastal building line; and
b)are setback a minimum of 6m
from the seaward boundary AND
O21 Where a coastal building line S21.1 No solution provided Complies – all structures are setback
does not exist on properties from seaward boundary.
fronting the beachfront or a
reserve adjoining the beachfront–
buildings, other structures and
retaining walls are setback a
minimum of 6m from the seaward
boundary of the site AND
O22 Rear fences adjacent to the S22.1Rear fences adjacent to the Complies – proposal able to comply
beachfront within the Coastal beachfront within the Coastal Protection with requirements
Protection Area are designed and Area incorporate the following—
sited to be sympathetic with the a)no more than 1.2m in height; and
visual amenity of the beachfront b)open construction(ie at least 50%
and do not degrade the natural transparent);
beachfront character c)lightweight materials (ie timber); and
d)dark colours to blend with the natural
landscape. AND
S20.2Gates are not installed in fences to
gain direct access to the beachfront.
The Biodiversity Overlay maps the eastern third of the site as being in the Environmental Protection
Area. Assessment against the overlay is triggered where there is clearing of vegetation. In this
instance, a number of cycads and small ground covers around the pool area are proposed to be
removed. These plants are not of local origin as per the Noosa Plan and do not substantially
contribute to the landscaped setting of the area. Significant landscaping is proposed along the
northern side boundary as replacement for these plants.
Some minor excavation of the site is required to facilitate the construction of the ground floor gym.
The removal of the existing mounding and landscaping in front of the garage results in the loss of
two palm trees and ground covers. These palms and ground covers do not contribute significantly to
the amenity of the area, provide screening to the existing building and are not native to the coastal
beachfront area.
Figure 6 – Photograph of landscape mound to be replaced by proposed gym
Page 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Planning Statement.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.8 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.