PM Submission - Paul Noonan - MCU25/0118

                     D) The proposed C2B building looks like 3 storeys high when viewed at least from the new
                     road/driveway (as seen in RPS’s Figure 5). The engineering report 2.0 states “the built form
                     of the development follows the natural topography, providing three separate levels, but
                     adhering to Council’s height limits.” This is a definite statement that the south building is 3
                     stories but because the hill has been excavated the height limit is not exceeded. This
                     contravenes Council’s performance outcome PO17 (see below).




                     Re PO17, there are several obvious problems with this compliance statement.

                     (a) The proposed buildings have nothing consistent with the character of the area (low
                     density residential, open space and cemetery)

                     (b) C2B would visually dominate the area

                     (c) C2B would substantially upset the amenity of surrounding development for the reasons
                     explained in this letter, and

                     (f) the elevation from the access road to C2B off Dianella Ct ‘looks like 3 storeys high’ (see
                     RPS’s Figure 5), considering the underground car park. The C2B also looks like 3 storeys
                     when the view from Wilgee Court is considered (with the development running up the hill
                     and the rear rooves appearing higher than the front rooves).




                                                                    4
Document Set ID: 24329288
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025