Original source · versioned page text
Minor Change STP3977
STEFFAN ‘4 HARRIES Assessment of proposed change The development will continue to operate as per approval MCU22/0133.01, including the removal of the cooktop when ‘Building 2’ is constructed. Since the building form, scale and operation align with approval MCU22/0133.01, we have determined that staging the development will not cause adverse impacts. verview of Floor Plan Chan © = Figure 1: Stage 1 - Proposed Floor Plan Source: The Outside Perspective PARKING SPACE Figure 2: Stage 2 - Proposed Floor Plan. Note removal of cooktop in ‘Building 1’. Source: The Outside Perspective edited by SH. The proposed changes are considered to minor in nature as it does not result in a substantially different development. The representations provided are an improvement on the current conditions imposed under the approval. The proposed development is compliant with the definition of a Minor Change as outlined within Schedule 2 of the Planning Act 2016, as outlined below. Definition Response (i) would not result in substantially different The proposed development won't result in development; substantially different development. Please refer to the below for further justification. (ii) if a development application for the (A) The proposed development won’t result in development, including the change, were made prohibited development. when the change application is made would not (B) The proposed development will not require cause— referral to a referral agency. (A) the inclusion of prohibited development (C) No additional referral agencies have been in the application; or identified. (B) referral to a referral agency, other than (D) This change does not require a referral. to the chief executive, if there were no Page 3 of 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original