Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1 · OPW15/0240

Attached to the e-mail OPW15/0240 - Operational Works Application.

of 16

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Callaghan & Toth Pty Ltd

Performance outcomes                       Acceptable outcomes                                               Response       Comment
                                                                                                                            maintained.
PO8 Development avoids or minimises        AO8.1 Works are located, designed, and constructed to                           The directional drill of the rising main and no clearing on the
impacts on fish habitat values.            minimise impacts on fish habitat values and function.                            banks of Weyba Creek ensure there are no impacts to fish
                                                                                                                            habitat values for the new works.
Within a strategic environmental area: hydrological processes
PO9 Development avoids or minimises       No acceptable outcome is prescribed.                                             The construction of the new rising main will not impact
impacts on natural drainage lines or flow                                                                                   natural drainage lines. The drill pits and connection pits will
paths, during both construction and                                                                                         be reinstated to existing surface levels and conditions.
operation.
Within a strategic environmental area: water quality
PO10 Development avoids or minimises       AO10.1 Development demonstrates best practice                                   The emergency works involved removing any contaminated
any adverse impacts on environmental       environmental management to meet relevant                                        soil from the sewer split. The works involved redirecting
values and water quality objectives for    environmental values and water quality objectives of the                         sewage flows and isolating the rising main whilst it has been
receiving waters (surface and              Environmental Protection (Water) Policy or relevant to the                       repaired. The new rising main will replace the faulty rising
groundwater) from pollutants on site or    ERA to be carried out on the site.                                               main to reduce risk of further breakages.
leaving a site located in a strategic
environmental area.                        OR

                                           AO10.2 All stormwater, wastewater, discharges and                               The emergency works involved removing any contaminated
                                           overflows leaving the site are:                                                  soil from the sewer split. The works involved redirecting
                                                                                                                            sewage flows and isolating the rising main whilst it has been
                                           (1) treated to the quality of the receiving waters prior to                      repaired. The new rising main will replace the faulty rising
                                               discharge, OR;                                                               main to reduce risk of further breakages.

                                           (2) reclaimed or re-used such that there is no export of
                                               pollutants to receiving waters.


Table 10.1.3: Reconfiguring a lot
Performance outcomes                       Acceptable outcomes                                               Response       Comment
PO1 Erosion prone areas in a coastal       AO1.1 Where reconfiguring a lot is proposed within the            N/A            N/A
management district are maintained as      coastal management district, the erosion prone area
development free buffers, or where         within the lot, or land within 40 metres of the foreshore
permanent buildings or structures exist,   (whichever is greater), is surrendered to the State for
coastal erosion risks are avoided or       public use unless:
mitigated.                                 (1) the development is in a port or is for coastal-
                                                dependent development, or
                                           (2) the surrender of the land will not enhance coastal
                                                management outcomes, for example, because there
                                                is already substantial development seaward of the lot.



State development assessment provisions                                     Module 10 — Coastal protection         10.1 Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
6 July 2015 V1.6                                                                                                                                                                     Page 15 of 16

Used in these records

About this file

File size
271 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1.pdf · 271 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.