Council archive · source document
sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1 · OPW15/0240
Attached to the e-mail OPW15/0240 - Operational Works Application.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Callaghan & Toth Pty Ltd
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
maintained.
PO8 Development avoids or minimises AO8.1 Works are located, designed, and constructed to The directional drill of the rising main and no clearing on the
impacts on fish habitat values. minimise impacts on fish habitat values and function. banks of Weyba Creek ensure there are no impacts to fish
habitat values for the new works.
Within a strategic environmental area: hydrological processes
PO9 Development avoids or minimises No acceptable outcome is prescribed. The construction of the new rising main will not impact
impacts on natural drainage lines or flow natural drainage lines. The drill pits and connection pits will
paths, during both construction and be reinstated to existing surface levels and conditions.
operation.
Within a strategic environmental area: water quality
PO10 Development avoids or minimises AO10.1 Development demonstrates best practice The emergency works involved removing any contaminated
any adverse impacts on environmental environmental management to meet relevant soil from the sewer split. The works involved redirecting
values and water quality objectives for environmental values and water quality objectives of the sewage flows and isolating the rising main whilst it has been
receiving waters (surface and Environmental Protection (Water) Policy or relevant to the repaired. The new rising main will replace the faulty rising
groundwater) from pollutants on site or ERA to be carried out on the site. main to reduce risk of further breakages.
leaving a site located in a strategic
environmental area. OR
AO10.2 All stormwater, wastewater, discharges and The emergency works involved removing any contaminated
overflows leaving the site are: soil from the sewer split. The works involved redirecting
sewage flows and isolating the rising main whilst it has been
(1) treated to the quality of the receiving waters prior to repaired. The new rising main will replace the faulty rising
discharge, OR; main to reduce risk of further breakages.
(2) reclaimed or re-used such that there is no export of
pollutants to receiving waters.
Table 10.1.3: Reconfiguring a lot
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
PO1 Erosion prone areas in a coastal AO1.1 Where reconfiguring a lot is proposed within the N/A N/A
management district are maintained as coastal management district, the erosion prone area
development free buffers, or where within the lot, or land within 40 metres of the foreshore
permanent buildings or structures exist, (whichever is greater), is surrendered to the State for
coastal erosion risks are avoided or public use unless:
mitigated. (1) the development is in a port or is for coastal-
dependent development, or
(2) the surrender of the land will not enhance coastal
management outcomes, for example, because there
is already substantial development seaward of the lot.
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
6 July 2015 V1.6 Page 15 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 271 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.