Council archive · source document
sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1 · OPW15/0240
Attached to the e-mail OPW15/0240 - Operational Works Application.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Callaghan & Toth Pty Ltd
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
erosion presents an imminent threat to adverse coastal erosion impacts, and the structures
public safety or permanent structures. cannot reasonably be relocated or abandoned.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal AND
protection work must be supported by a report
certified by an RPEQ that demonstrates how AO8.2 Coastal protection work to protect private N/A N/A
the engineering solution sought by the work structures is undertaken on private land to the maximum
will be achieved.
extent reasonable.
AND
AO8.3 Coastal protection work does not increase the N/A N/A
coastal hazard risk for adjacent areas or properties.
PO9 Development avoids adverse AO9.1 Development: The directional drilling of the rising main means there are no
impacts on matters of state (1) is set back from matters of state environmental impacts to mangroves, and very limited impacts to the
environmental significance, or where this significance coastal ecosystems. The impact areas are the launch pit,
is not reasonably possible, impacts are (2) avoids interrupting, interfering or otherwise adversely connection pits and exit pits which will be rehabilitated with
minimised and an environmental offset is impacting underlying natural ecosystem components native vegetation.
provided for any significant residual or processes and interactions that affect or maintain
impacts to matters of state environmental the matters of state environmental significance, such
significance that are prescribed as water quality, hydrology, geomorphology and
environmental matters. biological processes, or
(3) incorporates measures as part of its location and
design to protect and retain matters of state
environmental significance and underlying ecosystem
processes within and adjacent to the development
site to the greatest extent practicable.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify any
threatened species or their habitats, or threatened ecosystems
that may be affected by the proposal. In particular, applications
should identify and describe how the development avoids
adverse impacts on any critical life stage ecological processes
within or adjacent to the development area.
AND
AO9.2 An environmental offset is provided for any N/A N/A
significant residual impact on matters of state
environmental significance that are prescribed
environmental matters caused by the development.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
anticipated losses, and outline what actions are proposed to be
undertaken to offset the loss in accordance with the Significant
Residual Impact Guideline and the relevant Queensland
Environmental Offsets Policy.
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
6 July 2015 V1.6 Page 9 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 271 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.