2014-03-25 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda Pages 81-167

PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                25 MARCH 2014


 191 Hollett Rd     Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a Lot (52 Lots & Park) approved
 Noosaville         via Court Order on 5 July 2013 for Planning & Environment Court Appeal
 (Lot 53            No.344 of 2009 – John Hoffman vs Sunshine Coast Council and Chief
 SP163571)          Executive under the Vegetation Management Act. The majority of the
                    development is located on the western side of Walter Hay Drive, with only
                    two rural lots and parkland located on the eastern side. The 49 approved
                    rural residential lots range in size from 4,000m2 to 1.14ha and are not
                    connected to town water or sewerage.

                    The approved residential areas partly correspond with Precincts 3 and 4 of
                    the current application. Access to the development is via Hollet Road, with
                    no access via Walter Hay Drive.

                    The approval requires upgrades to Hollett Road and thereby differs notably
                    from the Noosa on Weyba application, which does not propose to upgrade
                    Hollett Road to Eumundi Noosa Road west of Precinct 3.

                    A copy of the approved plan is included as Attachment 6.

The applicant submitted the following composite representation of the existing approvals over the
site:




                                 Figure 8 – Existing Approvals
4.2   Pre-lodgement Meeting
A pre-lodgement meeting was held with the applicant on 25 September 2012 to discuss the
proposal. The applicant was given preliminary advice on the areas of primary concern for
Council’s assessment and the specialist assessment reports that would be needed to accompany
any application. Council’s chairperson for the meeting has confirmed that the applicant was
advised that it appeared there were insufficient grounds in favour of the proposal to overcome the
planning conflicts and the development was unlikely to be supported.



                                                                                  Page 95 of 231