Original source · versioned page text
2014-03-25 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda Pages 81-167
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 25 MARCH 2014
The Regional Plan does not identify the need for expansion of urban areas at the northern end of
the Sunshine Coast. There is sufficient development capacity within the draft Sunshine Coast
planning scheme and The Noosa Plan to accommodate the Regional Plan dwelling targets and
increased density for the region, without the need to approve other development outside
identified urban growth areas. Notably, the draft Sunshine Coast planning scheme has advanced
through State interest checks, which specifically addressed the region’s growth capacity.
The applicant submits that the development meets all the Desired Regional Outcomes listed in
the Regional Plan. This view is strongly refuted. An assessment against the development’s
consistency with the Desired Regional Outcomes of the SEQ Regional Plan Part D – Regional
Policies is provided below.
Desired Regional Outcome Assessment
1. Sustainability and climate Does not comply
change
Elements of the proposed residential design guidelines
The region grows and changes in and water re-use strategies advance sustainability
a sustainable manner - principles but, overall, the development does not meet
generating prosperity, maintaining this outcome.
and enhancing quality of life,
minimising the use of resources, The development will suffer from poor levels of
providing high levels of accessibility and public transport. Its location and
environmental protection, layout will entrench car dependency for most residents
reducing greenhouse gas when accessing goods and services. The development
emissions and becoming resilient precincts represent a piecemeal and inefficient
to natural hazards including the extension to Noosa’s urban footprint that require undue
projected effects of climate works and infrastructure.
change and oil supply
vulnerability.
2. Natural Environment Does not comply
A healthy and resilient natural The proposal will have unacceptable impacts on the
environment is protected, biodiversity values of the site and surrounding sensitive
maintained and restored to habitat areas. The development will result in the loss of
sustainably support the region’s significant habitat, sever or restrict critical
rich biodiversity and ecosystem environmental corridors and is likely to impact on a
services including clean air and range of terrestrial and aquatic species of flora and
water, outdoor lifestyles and other fauna, including a number of rare and threatened
community needs that critically species. Koala numbers in the area will likely be
underpin economic and social reduced, with urban development known to pose the
development. primary risks to their survival.
3. Regional Landscape Does not comply
Key environmental, economic, The local government planning schemes seek to
social and cultural values of the protect the environmentally sensitive and non-urban
regional landscape are identified character of the site. The relatively intensive urban
and secured to meet community development will be out of character with its setting and
needs and achieve ecological impact on the valued landscape.
sustainability.
The extension of Noosa’s urban footprint to the south
will reduce the inter-urban break and the scenic
amenity of the area’s principal entrance.
Page 106 of 231
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.