Original source · versioned page text
2014-03-25 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda Pages 81-167
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 25 MARCH 2014
Traffic – General
An extra 6600 vehicles per day on the existing Council’s traffic engineer has identified a
road infrastructure will impact upon the number of road upgrades as a
function and safety of the roads and will erode consequence of the development.
the liveability of the area and cause noise While projected levels of service across
pollution. intersections and roundabouts in the
Increased traffic will increase maintenance broader network may remain within
costs. acceptable levels, additional traffic on the
Heavy vehicles, noise and dust impacts over 8 local road network is generally
years of construction resulting in safety risk undesirable.
and air/noise pollution.
Upgrades to Tidswell and Hollett Roads will
increase danger for pedestrians and cyclists
using these roads.
Existing roads are unable to cope with current
traffic and wear and tear.
Traffic – Walter Hay Drive
The proposal to install a major roundabout on The impacts from the addition of a double
Walter Hay Drive between the two existing lane, four node roundabout servicing
roundabouts and within an existing 100k zone, approximately 500 dwellings to each side
will diminish the overall function and utility of of Walter Hay Drive is a highly undesirable
the road and cause trip delays. outcome. Walter Hay Drive’s function as a
Safety of local residents and commuters along limited access road and a preferred route
Walter Hay Drive will be compromised as a to Eumundi Noosa Road will be reduced.
result of traffic congestion.
Social
The development will significantly alter the The development would not result in social
social fabric of the region. The new residents problems and should be able to provide
will be socially and geographically isolated as attractive urban estates for residents but
the development is outside of the current does not promote higher order urban
urban footprint. design objectives, such as high levels of
The development will not provide affordable accessibility or public transport integration.
housing.
The development risks adverse community
problems and anti-social behaviour that arise
from overcrowding.
Page 154 of 231
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.