Original source · versioned page text
Development Application part 2 Report and Plans MCU13/0052
The original of this document is very large (119 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSloping sites S14.1 Buildings are of split 014 Not applicable.
-
014 On sloping sites, level design that step down the The proposed facility will be
buildings and structures are slope or have suspended floor developed on flat land for which
designed to maxi mise the use construction; (See Figure 4-1 minimal earthworks are required
of natural slope and minimise below) (refer to compliance with
the need for cut and fill. Earthworks Code at Section 7.2.3).
AND
S14.2 Cut or fill is less than 2m
in depth relative to natural
ground surface;
AND
S14.3 The distance between
the ground and the lowest part
of the floor of the building does
not exceed 3m to avoid large
under building areas.
Figure 8.1-Design for
sloping sites (suspended
floor)
:;\J~
,
~.
~1IIf.:
4.11 Environment, Conservation and Recreation
Environment & cultural No solution provided. 015 -
Complies.
heritage values The proposal is appropriately
015 There are no significant located within a low density rural
adverse effects on area used for
farming purposes
the biodiversity, natural and will require vegetation
not
vegetation, native wildlife, removal. The proposed facility has
habitats, landscape quality, been located outside of areas
water quality or cultural mapped as ’Riparian Buffer Area’,
heritage values, including ’Koala Habitat Area’ and
those related to- ’Environmental Enhancement
a)changes to natural Area’ on the Biodiversity Overlay.
drainage;
b) disturbance to any of the Although the proposed facility is
wetland systems; located approximately 60 m from
.
c) management of landslide the border of the Great Sandy
and fire risk; National Park, the location is
d) erosion and the transport of considered appropriate as the
sediments off site; facility will be separated from the
e) unmanaged public access; National Park by a bitumen road
f) effluent disposal and located over 350 m from the
g) changes to fauna habitat closest portion of mapped remnant
and behaviour; and vegetation within the National
h) disturbance of buildings Park. The
proposed facility is
and features, including natural otherwise appropriately setback
features, of cultural heritage from environmentally sensitive
significance. areas (eg more than 900 m from
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.