Original source · versioned page text
Development Application part 2 Report and Plans MCU13/0052
The original of this document is very large (119 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn4,5,6 or 7; facility within the Boreen Point
f) Education; North! Cootharaba locality. Of the
g) Emergency service Type three (3) candidates which were
1.
, investigated for the facility, the
h) Open space Type 1; current site was determined to be
i) Wellbeing; most appropriate given it’s positive
j) All Infrastructure Uses; visual outcomes whilst ensuring
k) Multiple housing Types 2, there are no detrimental effects to
3,4 or 5; and use of the land and surrounds as
I) Visitor accommodation outlines below:
Type 4. . The proposed facility has been
appropriately sited on the
periphery of the concentrated
residential dwellings (aligning
Kildeys Road) and over 2 km
from the Boreen Point
township;
. Provides an adequate
separation distance from
community sensitive land uses
and residential dwellings as
there are only 3 residential
dwellings within a 500 m radius
of the proposed facility;
. Located a sufficient buffer
distance from environmentally
sensitive locations and no
vegetation removal will be
required;
. Significant areas of matu
vegetation also exist on site and
within the surrounding area
which will help to
mitigate potential visual impacts
associated with the
,.
development.
Therefore although identified as an
inconsistent land use, the.proposed
facility is
considered compatible
with development in the
and is
..
surrounding area
appropriate in this location.
4.32 Effects of Use
Sloping sites & ridgelines 555.1 Buildings and 055 Not applicable.
-
055 Development on sloping associated The development is not located on
sites_:’_ accessways are not a sloping site or ridgeline.
a) is responsive to the natural constructed on land with a
topography of the site and slope greater than 1 in 4 056 -
Complies.
minimises the need for cut (25%); The proposed development will not
and fill adv rsely affect the
landscape
b) does not visually dominate AND character and visual
amenity
the hill slope or rnterrupt the quality of hill slo es and ridgelines
skyline; 555.2 Buildings present no as the proposed development Will
c) is integrated with the more than 2 storeys at anyone not be located within the vicinity
natural site characteristics point when viewed from the these elevated areas.
including vegetation; road or other public space; and
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.