Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

Minor Change Report 132001 210327 1 · 132001.210327.1

of 17

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

               •      The proposed development has opted to retain natural vegetation that assists in screening
                      or visually softening development; and
               •      the proposed development continues to use materials, finishes and colours that
                      complement the natural setting and integrate with the landscape and skyline.
               Given the existing dwelling house use and the relatively small nature of the proposed development
               in conjunction with the mature vegetation of the site the works are considered to comply with the
               Performance Outcome.


               Side Setback
               POD - Building setbacks to the boundaries of the development site, Group Title Lot Boundaries &
               Coastal Management Control District are to be a min of 1.5 metres or half the building height
               whichever is the greater.
               Assessment
               The proposed development seeks relaxation along one of the side boundaries (northern boundary)
               where the new proposed garage, family room and bedroom 5 are to be located. The applicant
               proposes a 3.0 metre setback from the boundary to the outside wall on the lower and upper levels.
               As the overall height of the guest room and family room projection on ‘Section A’ shows 7.5 metres
               from natural ground to the top of the projection, the resulting side setback required under the POD
               is 3.75 metres. Therefore, a portion of the upper level family room will not comply with the side set
               back provision of the POD (refer Figure 10).




                             Figure 10 – Section view showing partial non-compliance with POD setback provisions

               Noting the above, the scale of non-compliance is minor, as only approximately 1.5 metres of side
               facade will require more than standard 3.0 metres of setback in the POD. There are two large
               windows on the upper level, one is for the garage (which is non-habitable) and the other is a family
               room. To avoid potential overlooking and privacy impacts the large window for the family room will
               be conditioned to provide standard privacy provisions such as highset windows, translucent
               treatments or screening measures (refer Figure 11).




                                                                                                           Page 12 of 17

Document Set ID: 23279545
Version: 5, Version Date: 09/12/2024

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.1 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Minor Change Report 132001 210327 1.pdf · 5.1 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.