Minor Change Report 132001 210327 1 · 132001.210327.1

               This set back of 1.5 metres stipulated in the POD, is important to be able to maintain a small buffer
               from any hard surfaces to the rear boundary which is a Coastal Management District Area reserve
               as approved on the original POD. The built to boundary deck extension is not warranted given this
               fact, and new native land scaping annotated on ‘Section A’, cannot reasonably be achieved without
               meaningful set back of the deck extensions (refer Figure 13).




                           Figure 13 –Section A view showing ‘new native landscaping’ and deck extension interface

               Therefore, amended plans will be conditioned to require a full 1.5 metre rear setback for the length
               of the deck extension. Based on the setback being achieved, the proposed development can
               reasonably comply with the POD provisions relating to the rear setback.


               Condition 10
               10.    Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the
                      approved plans of development. The approved plans are numbered 0119.01 and 0119.02
                      prepared by Stephen Kidd Design and dated Oct 2001 and as may be amended by these
                      conditions.
               Applicant’s Request
               10.    Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the
                      approved plans of development. The approved plans are numbered drawing no. 2000, 2001,
                      2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 3000, 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 4000, 4001, 4002, 4003 rev DD5
                      and dated 02/09/24 prepared by Sealand Architects.
               Assessment of Request
               In assessing the applicants request council generally agrees with the request (with the exception
               of the amended plans required) and proposes that condition 10 be amended as follows;
               10.    Development authorised by this approval must be undertaken generally in accordance with
                      the Approved Plans listed in the tables below. The plans must be amended to incorporate
                      the amendments listed within the table below and resubmitted to Council prior to the issue
                      of any Development Permit for Building Works*
               4.     CONSULTATION
               4.1. Referral Agencies
               Not applicable
               4.2. Internal Council Referrals
               Not applicable
               5.     CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
               The proposed development generally complies with the requirements of the planning scheme and
               does not raise any significant issues that cannot be addressed by reasonable and relevant
               conditions. The application is therefore recommended for approval.
               The report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
                                                                                                            Page 14 of 17

Document Set ID: 23279545
Version: 5, Version Date: 09/12/2024