2017-12-12 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                               12 DECEMBER 2017


3.2. State and Other Statutory Instruments
State Planning Policies
 State Planning Policy July 2014
The above State Planning Policies have been deemed by the Minister for Local Government and
Planning as appropriately reflected in the Planning Scheme and therefore do not warrant a
separate assessment.
South East Queensland (SEQ) Regional Plan 2009 - 2031
The site is located within the Urban Footprint of the SEQ Regional Plan. The proposal is
consistent with the regional policies of the SEQ Regional Plan.
State Planning Regulatory Provisions
The proposal is for an urban activity within the Urban Footprint and is consistent with the SEQ
Regional Plan Regulatory Provisions

3.3. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The subject site is located in the Noosaville Locality and is zoned Attached Housing. The
proposed uses are identified as inconsistent uses within the zone and are required to follow an
impact assessable application process.
Locality Provisions
The subject site is located in a residential zone. A zoning plan is provided below in Figure 2. The
Noosa Plan zones the site (including all lots between the Good Shepherd Lutheran School and
Headland Drive, Noosaville) for Attached Housing with the desired Overall Outcomes for the land
being:
“…preservation of land for residential uses, specifically for multiple housing forms which
accommodates residents and visitors predominantly multiple housing forms that:
   contribute to a high level of residential amenity, design quality and safety;
   respect the scale and character of the streetscape and surrounding development;
   Are located within convenient access of employment centres, goods and services, public
     transport and community facilities.”
Aside from residential home-based businesses and an estate sales office, The Noosa Plan
nominates all other business uses as inconsistent uses for the zone requiring an impact
assessable development application. Other uses including Community Uses, Infrastructure Uses
and Agricultural Uses are listed as inconsistent impact assessable development as they are
considered incompatible with surrounding residential development.




                                                                                     Page 48 of 95