2017-06-12 General Committee Agenda

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   12 JUNE 2017




                                    Page 6 of 32

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                                     12 JUNE 2017

                                                                                                                                                           Attachment 1
                                                                                     Final Evaluation

                                   Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet

  vceee                          Loe)               +
  No. |NAME OF TENDERER              (excl of GS
  1 [Storm intematonalPtyLid.—~~S~SCS<C ;«SC];3SS”*~*~*” a "0 »    ”    “   “0    6   n    ”    ”    ‘wo
  > faecoro clens Sens                              Unocceptae Very Poor Pree    Dood      very ood Encoqtenet
  3 [Total Building Maintenance                     The ratings:
  4 |Achieve Corporate ServcesPlyltd~~—~—SCS«S      + 0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
  5 [Biniris(Aust.) PtyLtd                          + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
  6 |Ecovist                                        + 40 (forty) = Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
  7 [Quality Commercial Cleaning Pty Ltd(ESA Group) + 60 (sixty) = Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
  8                                                 + 80 (eighty) = Very Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
  9 |Kerle Projects                                 + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
  10
  1                                                 Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
  12 |4 Perfect Cleaning Services (Procure Spot)
  13 [Swampy CleanngSSCSC~S
    NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                 Number of Tenders Evaluated = [13 ]
                                           1           2          3           4         5          6          7          8          9          10         11         12        13
    —                              Pena        aac       |     mane fgets] a                        |e                    | mene | mr, |g
                                                                                                          Quality

                                                                                                        (ESA Group)
    SN ed rg ed eg ed                                                                ed                    dg ee eed
    arabity@ Resourcing  |       | sco | ze | oo | 20 | moo | a5 | seo | ze | roo | as | v0 | «5 | so | ze | ooo | 20 | so | 20 | soo | ze | soo | 20 | seo | 20 | coo | 20 |
    ontactexperieneescapscty | 2% | seo | ss6 | sro | 114 | oso | 136 | seo | 116 | seo | 112 | 900 | wo | seo | 116 | oo | 160 | 70 | 154 | soo | 160 | roo | 140 | seo | 108 | seo | 16 |
   paetnocotoay              om]      7 | so | sor | sa | ser | a0 | azo | 43 | ceo | ao | 63 | os | aro | 47 | ors | s7 | res | 79 | oo4 | co | one | eo | oe | oe | o50 | 95 |
                          mn         °° | 92 | azo | 71 | 30 | 110 | eso | os | seo | 7 | oro | v2 | sso | eo | mo | u1 | m0 | 107 | oso | s20 | oxo | v6 | aro | zs | aro | 71 |
    eat Satay                       mo | so | too | 20 | moo | a5 | ooo | 30 | 0} so | oo | 20 | ooo | 20 | soo | 25 | soo | 25 | tooo] so | soo | 25 | ao | 20 | wo | 20 |
    Environment @Sustainbity | %  | sz0 | 26 | soo | 15 | mo | a7 | coo | 0 | oo | 4s | reo | se | wo | 10 | mo | a7 | zo | s6 | wo | 43 | ovo | 29 | aro | 24 | aro | 2a |
   Gentatontekscalteoromy | iow   | az | 2s | coo [co | sas | sa { coo | co | sas | 24 | tooo] oo | oo | oo | v0 | 20 | soo | as | zoo | 20 | vo | ze | coo | oo | ovo | 2s |
   Nomalleed Teotnical Score (Tn)
   PART Brice element                 pty Lid | Cleaning Services | Maintenance | ServcesPryiid'| ud |__F®°¥*t_ | commerciat_| concepts pry id | KevleProiects_ | cervees py Lid | Cleaning Services| Services Procure | SWamY Channa
    Total Fees (Pc)          50%         50        85,626     557 880     90,558     93,20      05,300     08,50      34,510     49,760     68,425     0,10      90,75      04,
    Price Score                                    133.0                  129.1      127.1      117.6                94.7       82.8       68.2       66.9       50.7       40.0
    Normalised Price Score (Pn)                    92.7                   90.0       88.5       81.9                 66.0        57.7       475       46.6       35.3       278
    Weighted Price Score (Pw)

    elements
    OTHER DETAILS
       Assesment panel member 1   Facility Officer (IP)
       Assesment panel member 2 Building & Plumbing Services Manager (AH) The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
       Assesment panel member 3 Health & Safety Officer (MS)          Contract Administrator's signature:
      Assesment panel member 4  Procurement Advisor (AH)

                                                                                                      Page 6 of 32