2017-06-12 General Committee Agenda

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   12 JUNE 2017




                                    Page 7 of 32

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                                                12 JUNE 2017

                                                                                                Final Evaluation

                                         Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet

      [ContractNo;           tt TOOT
        ee ee
       ee
    No, |VAME OF TENDERER                   excl of OS     t—>—_+—_}+—_+—_+-—_ +—_ +--+
     1                                                     Lani ©     |          a    8    &     "    ian   "  ~3
     3 Biniris (Aust) PtyLtd                               The ratings
     4 [McCullough CleaningServices                         +0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
     5 |LagunaLawns&Gardens Cid                             + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
     6 [DW Commercial Cleaning Services PtyLtd              + 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
     7 |CMBM Facility ServcesPtyLtd                         + 60 (sixty) = Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
     8 |lanTattersal                                        * 80 (eighty) = Very Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
     9 lEcovist                                             + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional — the content of the submission for that criteria is flawiess / outstanding and most advantageous
     i" Swampy Changs                                      Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
       [TotalFocusConcepts
     12 [Total Building Maintenance
     13
       NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                      Number of Tenders Evaluated = [13 ]
       Poo notevaluatoc
                                          -       1            2           3           4           5           6           7           8           9           10         41          12          13

       emtencmn              [women || ace |r| oe |                    | ey [S| es | eee [oS
         maser                             § | 2 | % | 20 | m | 350 | a | 200 | o | as | s | 200 | 6 | 200 | oo | «50 | oo | 450 | oo | 200 | oo | soo | vo | 250 | se | 200 |
       Comctesweriencescapscty | am] se | sco | se | sxe | oe | ssz0 | 7 | ao| os | r900{ mo | woo] a | oo] os | 10 | oo | r9m | oo | soo | se | 100                           oo | 1360    se | 1100 |
      peetrocoioay                me] | 2m | ie | to | te | to | im | 240 | a | sc | om | 260 | sm | aa | mo | 300 | 2s | 205 | me | 200 | 25 | sso | ass | o55 | o6 | 200 |
                      a         I a
                      a          a                                                                                                               EE EE
       envronmentasusamabmy |S] | om | se | zm | w | am | o | 150 | oo | 2s | ov | 20 | ow | ao | so | 2% | re | sm | rm | sm | a7 | 205 | m | s70 | oo | 200 |
       Sentinaiontouscattcoromy | tox  | + | oso | x2 | cue | sas | sxe | a | reo | ico | om] a | 200 | zw | aw | too | sooo] soo | rom] a | zoo | ze | au | ss | sos | zo | 200 |
      Nommalised Technical Score (Tn)

       Total Fees (Pc)            30%         7,987       19,048       12,036      14,560      18,018      18,287      19,513     121,539      21,580      1,805                               5,273
       Price Score                            164          159          145         134         118         117        111         102         102         101                                 42
       Normalised Price Score (Pn)            100          97          89          82           72          71         68           62          62         62                                   oO
       iWeighted Price Score (P
       elements
       OTHER DETAILS
          Assesment panel member 1 Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure
          Assesment panel member 2 Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
          Assesment panel member 3 A0Director, Planning and Infrastructure     Contract Administrator's signature:
          Assesment panel member 4

                                                                                                                  Page 7 of 32