Original source · versioned page text
2015-09-15 Infrastructure and Services Committee Att 2 to Item 4 The J Service Review 2014-15
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Service Review 2014-15
The J
10.9.2 Potential Service Delivery Models
Delivery models for community venues were given considerable attention during the Community and
Performance Venues Future Direction study undertaken by 99 Consulting for SCC in 2012. The
findings are still relevant today, and are outlined below:
Local governments continue to look for the perfect solution to managing assets. The perfect model is one that
ensures a venue achieves the outcomes desired by Council and community while freeing Council from capital
and operating cost and risk. As this model has yet to emerge, Councils continue to explore variations on a
number of approaches – from fully owned and managed in-house to completely transferring ownership to another
entity. Decisions about which approach to use are usually based on a number of factors:
Criticality and complexity: venues that are critical to the achievement of Council goal or require
significant nurturing are often managed in-house, with significant investment in programming as well as
the facility
Control: where Councils desire control over outcomes, they often operate venues themselves. Redland
City Council has recently brought management of many of this mainland community halls in-house for
this reason after an audit found issues
Cost: local governments have historically seen outsourced models as cost saving, transferring
responsibility for maintenance and operation to an external party such as a sports club or community
groups. However work done by Western Australia Department of Sport and Recreation on lifecycle
costing has highlighted the long term costs incurred through deferral of maintenance, a trend noted by
many local governments with their leased facilities
Capacity: increasingly, local governments are grappling with a lack of ability or willingness within
communities to take on roles that were traditionally done by volunteers. Managing community halls in
urban areas is a good example.
Council-owned performance venues are generally either managed directly by the local government or operated
by an external entity of which the local government is shareholder.
Generally speaking, an external entity approach is used for venues that are the key performing arts centre in their
region and are of a scale that justifies the establishment of a company or there are significant advantages in
operating outside of Council award structures.
General Management approaches are summarised below:
Approaches Description Examples
High control In house staffed and Council staff based on site handle bookings and Lake Kawana Community Centre
High investment programmed at the venue are responsible for programming to achieve Nambour CC
specific objectives.
In-house, off-site Council staff based off site handle bookings, Coolum Civic Centre; some Redlands
management, plus caretaker “looks after” users and has an on-site mainland halls
caretaker presence as needed.
In-house, off-site Council staff based off site handle bookings, on- Bicentennial Community Centre
management site work by head office staff when required Kawana Hall
Beerwah Hall
Agency bookings/ in-house External group handles bookings etc, Council staff some Logan City Council halls
maintenance act as caretakers and undertake maintenance
External group acts as External group contracted to handle bookings and Moreton model via Redcliffe Lions,
agent manage minor maintenance. Some or all hire fees Pine Rivers Neighbourhood
go to the agent to cover/subsidise their costs or to Association etc
support their own community activities.
Anchor tenant A group has use of all or part of the space and Milwell Road Community Centre
takes responsibility for bookings for other users
Shareholder model Council creates an external entity to lease the The Events Centre
(Board managed) facility.
Permit to occupy A group has permission to use the facility
Co-tenancy Several groups hold leases over parts of the facility
(usually with one lead group)
Tenancy A single tenant leases the facility (could be not-for- Many sports facilities on the
profit or commercial) Sunshine Coast
Gift Gift building for relocation OR venue and land to a
group
Low control Sale Sell building for relocation OR venue and land to a Fitzgibbon Community Centre
Low investment group (ULDA)
23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.