Original source · versioned page text
2014-10-14 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda - Pages 51 - 117
The original of this document is very large (16.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 14 OCTOBER 2014
Page 84 of 117
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 14 OCTOBER 2014
EDV PROPOSAL FOR A BOUNDARY CHANGE
(according to advice from the local child care centre). We also knew that during
this time, some 10% of our members as at 2006 had moved out of the district.
We realised we needed to repeat the research and establish if our 2006 findings
were applicable today.
Accordingly, we developed and are currently implementing a two stage process
to ascertain if the residents still support a boundary change.
1. Stage One (May to July): Revisit the concept of community of interest and
ascertain where the primary community of interest is for our area:
a. Gather data on our current community’s demographic profile, its
links with Surrounding areas and relevant economic and planning
information (undertaken by Ted Fitzgerald and documented in
Attachment Two);
b. Undertake a survey of residents to establish their personal linkages
(undertaken by d-sipher, an award winning market research
company and their report is in Attachment Three) and
c. Share the survey and demographic data with the local community
and seek input on the information presented.
2. Stage Two (August to October): Dependent on the results of the survey,
take active measures to document the level of community support for a
boundary change:
a. Identify key reasons for support for or against a boundary changes
from residents so as to provide information for both Councils on
resident views;
b. Present findings to the community;
c. Research and document potential benefits for both Councils
following informal discussions with each Council; and
d. Determine the best methodology to provide valid evidence of the
level of community support and implement this.
Stage One Results
Both survey and factual analysis showed very similar findings to that obtained in
2006 (i.e. strong community of interest links with Noosa Shire, far less
so with the Sunshine Coast and 80% indicating support for a boundary
change versus 13% against). This provided a base from which to undertake
further community consultation.
These results were reported back to three community meetings and at those
meetings a number of questions were asked. The questions in the main related
to benefits for a change, rates, the opportunity for people to have a say and the
survey results. These meetings achieved a key objective - to restart the
conversation in our community.
16
Submission from the EDV Group
Page 84 of 117See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.