Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Attachment 4 - Treee Management Plan_V1

of 29

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Log in to see the plans as drawn
           ARBORICULTURAL REPORT
                   Tree Management Plan

Project:              Site Redevelopment and Upgrades
Site Address:         Ozcare Noosa
                      80-100 Cooyar St,
                      Noosa Heads, QLD, 4567

Commissioned by:      Woollam Constructions

Local Authority:      Noosa Council (NC)
Application No.:      132001.210127.3

Date:                 Tuesday, 16 July 2024
Version:              1

Prepared by:

                      Matthew Duncan
                      Director / Principal Arborist

                      e: [email protected]
                      m: 0450 355 770

                      ABN:   68 153 548 531
Log in to download the original file

Attachment 4 - Treee Management Plan_V1.pdf · 4.7 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

Full text of the other 28 pages

Page 2

This document was prepared for the sole use of Woollam Construction, and any regulatory agencies
involved in this project. No other party should rely on this information without the prior written consent
of Consult Arborist and the client.

The findings laid out in this report are valid for 12 months from the assessment date.

If the advice and recommendations made in this report are not strictly adhered to, no responsibility will
be taken for the continuing health and condition of retained trees. Trees are dynamic living organisms
that respond to changes in their environs; repeat assessments are key to maintaining tree vitality,
structural integrity and reducing any potential risk they may pose.


C OPYRIGHT
This report/document is subject to copyright laws and remains the property of Consult Arborist Pty Ltd.
Penalties @280c per word per incident of unauthorised usage. No part of this report may be reproduced
or used without the written permission of Consult Arborist Pty Ltd. No responsibility will be accepted by
Consult Arborist Pty Ltd for unauthorised or partial use of this report.

General Permission of use as subject to Consult Arborist Pty Ltd copyrights:
• Hard copy permission: Entire copies may be printed for use by the Client for internal or Project
   liaison.
• Electronic permissions: Must be original PDF format for filing and/or limited to the agreed parties
   with a direct and vested interest in the case.


D OCUMENT C ONTROL
The latest approved version of this 24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1 should be available to all
personnel involved in the Project in consultation with Consult Arborist Pty Ltd.

Each new revision should be distributed to all key personnel for review and endorsement.

All individuals working near protected trees are to be made aware of this document and it is the
responsibility of the individual to implement and/or adhere to the recommendations and guidelines.

 Version                   Date                          Written             Reviewed            Approved
 Draft                     14/07/2024                    MJD                 SCD                 MJD
 One                       16/07/2024                    MJD                 SCD                 MJD



D OCUMENTS R EVIEWED
The following documents have been reviewed, analysed, and referenced during the production of this
report.

 Reference / Date                   Title / Details
 27/07/2023                         Noosa Council Letter of Decision Notice – Minor Change
 Tree Mark-up                       Tree Mark-up Plan – provided by Woollam Construction
 23/03/2023                         2. Fire Trail Clearance Plan – STP
                                    240611 Site Services Overlay - with Vegetation

Note: Extracts from the above document have been used to illustrate the text within this report but should be read with full
documents.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                                Page 2 of 29

Page 3

T ABLE OF C ONTENTS
Copyright .............................................................................................................................. 2
Document Control ................................................................................................................. 2
Documents Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 2
1     Brief ............................................................................................................................... 4
2     Site Inspection ............................................................................................................... 5
3     Scope and Limitations .................................................................................................... 5
    3.1       Contractors Notes.................................................................................................. 6
    3.2       Habitat Trees ......................................................................................................... 6
4     Background.................................................................................................................... 7
5     Site Plans....................................................................................................................... 8
6     Site Discussion .............................................................................................................. 9
    6.1       Fire Tanks and Pump Room ................................................................................ 11
    6.2       Generator and Switchboard ................................................................................. 13
    6.3       Firebreak & Access Track .................................................................................... 15
      6.3.1       Arborist Review................................................................................................ 17
7     Site Photos .................................................................................................................. 18
8     Tree Protection Guidelines (TPG) ................................................................................ 20
    8.1       The Role of the Project Arborist and Tree Protection ........................................... 20
    8.2       Calculating Tree Protection Zone......................................................................... 21
      8.2.1       TPZ.................................................................................................................. 21
      8.2.2       SRZ ................................................................................................................. 21
    8.3       Tree Protection .................................................................................................... 22
      8.3.1       TPZ Signs ........................................................................................................ 22
      8.3.2       Restricted Activities Within the TPZ ................................................................. 23
      8.3.3       Tree Protection Fencing (TPF)......................................................................... 23
    8.4       Mitigation Measures............................................................................................. 24
9     General Excavation Methodologies .............................................................................. 25
10         Hard Surface / Asphalt Removal.............................................................................. 26
11         References: ............................................................................................................. 27
12         Assumptions and Disclaimers.................................................................................. 27
Appendix 1: Definition of Terms .......................................................................................... 28
Appendix 2: Sample TPZ Fencing Sign ............................................................................... 29




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                                               Page 3 of 29

Page 4

1 B RIEF
This report has been commissioned by Woollam Constructions to fulfil the Noosa Council (NC)
DA conditions relating to the protection of the retained Allocasuarina littoralis, Black Sheoak
trees at the project site at Ozcare Noosa. Consult Arborist has been requested to provide
information on the site findings in relation to the development and offer advice and
methodologies for general tree protection of the Black Sheoak that are to be retained.

The subject trees inspected are as illustrated in the North Coast Environmental Plans, Bennett
and Bennett Site Tree Survey, STP site Civil & Track Layout plans, and Enrich Architecture
project plans.

This report is to fulfil Noosa Council conditions numbered 68 and 69 as per Decision Notice –
Minor Change letter dated 27/07/2023.




      Figure 1: Extract from the Noosa Council Decision Notice – Minor Change letter dated 27/07/2023




               Figure 2:Google overview of the Ozcare site and Cooyar Street, Noosa heads




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                  Page 4 of 29

Page 5

2 S ITE I NSPECTION
Matthew Duncan, the Director and Principal Arborist of Consult Arborist undertook the Visual
Tree and site assessments on the site from a ground level in July 2024. Matthew holds an
AQF Level 5 Diploma of Arboriculture (AHC50510), an International Society of Arboriculture’s
Tree Risk Assessment Qualification, valid from 2015 to 2030, and has worked in the
arboricultural industry since 1994. Since its establishment in 2011, Consult Arborist has been
engaged to provide arboricultural advice and guidance on private, civil, and capital works
projects from cross-sector clients throughout Queensland where he is a Queensland
Arboricultural Association (QAA) Qualified Member and Approved Consultant.

The weather at the time of the inspection was clear with light winds, and ground conditions
were dry underfoot with good access.

3 S COPE AND L IMITATIONS
The arboricultural assessment for this report is based on the methods outlined in the
International Society of Arboriculture’s Risk Assessment Methodology for trees. The level of
assessment undertaken for this report was a basic Level 1 visual assessment of the
surrounding area and the subject tree’s structure and health, from the ground on one side and
a Level 2 assessment on all sides of the tree was completed to assess further any visual
defects noted. No tree-specific risk assessment was undertaken for this report.

It is an assessment that includes the use of basic tools and techniques, i.e., cavity probing,
minor root collar excavation, measuring tapes and devices and photography to gather
information and not a full assessment of any trees’ structural safety. No trunk decay detection
equipment or ground radar was used as part of this Arboricultural Appraisal, no conclusive
comments on what may have been or may be happening within the internal structure of the
tree or the tree’s roots will be made. No tissue or soil samples have been collected or
submitted for testing. All data is based on visual inspection based on known industry
methodology of visual tree assessment VTA, of the tree/s and its/their location, species,
health, and condition at the time of inspection unless otherwise stated.

The information contained in this report is based on a visual inspection of each recorded tree
and its location, species, health, and condition at the time of inspection unless otherwise
stated. It is the author's opinion and is a 'snapshot in time' of the specific tree's health and
condition at the time of the inspection and no guarantee can be given that faults or issues may
not arise in the future.

The relevant tree information has been recorded to be used as a functional tool to determine
management strategy for the subject trees, considering attributes, conditions, past works,
location, project design, construction, and future use.

Site plans have been provided and used for reference with no changes to the design.

See the attached site photographs and site maps/plans for identification purposes.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                       Page 5 of 29

Page 6

Recommended arboricultural works are to be carried out by an arborist holding a minimum of
a Level 3 AQF qualification in Arboriculture with good working experience. It is expected that
the Arborist may encounter anomalies within the tree as they climb/work and as such may use
their discretion to remove any further branches or limbs which they may deem could pose an
immediate risk. Additional removals outside the recommendations or defects noted whilst in
the tree are to be recorded and reported to the author and/or discussed with a Level 5 Arborist
on site prior to undertaking the appropriate action.

All pruning is to be guided by AS 4373 – “Pruning of Amenity Trees”, industry best practice
and experience. The use of an Elevated work platform (Cherry picker) is recommended to
allow for safe access to the outer branches and more accurate pruning.



When undertaking remedial tree works on habitat trees, please be aware of the fauna and
their habitat. The creation of future habitat whilst undertaking remedial works is to be
considered. When mitigating hazardous deadwood, hollow sections and large branches,
minimal pruning or reduction of weight is required rather than total removal. Hollow sections
take many years to be created and are a highly valuable habitat. Coronet cuts should be
facilitated where appropriate to mimic natural branch failure on suitable trees in a natural
setting.



Please note all site activities are to be agreed upon and implemented in accordance with all
Health & Safety, Environmental and Cultural Heritage best practices with the approval
provided by the appropriate project entities.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                      Page 6 of 29

Page 7

4 B ACKGROUND
Consult Arborist has been engaged to provide arboricultural advice relating to the project
design and plans at the Noosa Ozcare site at 80-100 Cooyar Street, Noosa Heads. This report
focuses on the retention status of Black Sheoak trees found throughout the site within the
project scope.

The site is an existing residential care facility that is surrounded on the north, east and
southern side by the Girraween Nature Refuge. The redevelopment of site includes the
demolition and redevelopment of existing buildings, relocation and upgrades to services and
associated infrastructure, and the creation of a fire break and access track.

As per of the approval conditions, an Arborist Report is required to provide advice on the
retention and protection of retained trees. This advice will be guided by AS4970-2009
Protection of trees on development, industry best practice and experience.

The tree survey and tree plot as part of a Verification Plot was undertaken by Bennett and
Bennett, and extracts will be used and embellished to inform this report.




                       Figure 3 :Bennett and Bennett tree plot front cover plan




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                    Page 7 of 29

Page 8

5 S ITE P LANS




   Figure 4: Services plan provided by Woollam illustrating the locations for the Fire Water Tanks next to the
               Cooyar Street entrance and the new and ungraded Switch Board, and Generator.
                             The internal site services alignment is to be confirmed




     Figure 5: STP Earthworks/track Layout plan to provide a project overview, with the Pink shaded area
                                 illustrating the Firebreak and Access Track.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                       Page 8 of 29

Page 9

6 S ITE D ISCUSSION
The Ozcare property is located within a mix of natural and planted trees and vegetation. With
the site built approximately 30 years ago, most of the landscape planted trees have reached
their mature size and, in many areas, naturally occurring trees have grown up and infilled
spaces.

The existing site facility is proposed to be upgraded with the redevelopment of existing
buildings. This includes the upgrade of inground services with a new Fire Tank and Pump
Room and new Generator and Switchboard to be installed on the western side of the site that
abuts the natural road verge of Cooyar Street.

In recent years the creation of a Fire Break around the north and eastern site of the property
was approved. These works are planned to be undertaken as part of the upgrade and in the
process an access track will be created that will facilitate the construction phase of the project.

The Black Sheoak, Allocasuarina littoralis, has been highlighted as a tree species requiring
special consideration due to its importance to the local fauna, particularly the Glossy Black
Cockatoo. The Black Sheoak is a fast-growing semi-pioneer species which is found throughout
the site and the surrounding areas of Noosa and the Sunshine Coast. A broad age class of
these trees are found within the project scope area of the site. Clumps of emerging, naturally
occurring trees are along the edge of the Girraween Bushland, individual semi-mature trees
are throughout the site and mature and advanced-age trees are found in areas that have not
been disturbed in recent decades.

Black Sheoaks as a species, have a relatively short life expectancy as a mature tree and they
are highly susceptible to localised change which can bring about sudden decline, death, and
failure.

On observing the older trees on site, there is common trend for them to succumb to
environmental or site changes, quickly succumbing to root plate failure when infected with a
decay fungus. Commonly this fungus was noted as a Ganoderma species with fruiting bodies
found on both failed and on the standing trunks of older trees. The fungus attacks the tree’s
main trunk heartwood timber and structural roots, frequently resulting in root plate failure. This
can be seen throughout the site on many occasions.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                          Page 9 of 29

Page 10

   Figure 6: T43 - Recently failed Black Sheoak with   Figure 7: T9 - Mature Ganoderma fruiting body on
      Ganoderma fruiting body on the lower trunk                       Black Sheoak trunk



Where possible the Black Sheoak are proposed to be retained at the site except where
required to be removed to accommodate the approved project plans. An assessment of these
trees was made based on each tree’s current Health, Condition, project constructability, and
workplace Health and Safety. The results of this assessment are provided in the following
sections.

The site findings and arborist review are laid out to cover the three main areas of tree related
conflict and protection or mitigation measures required.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                               Page 10 of 29

Page 11

The location for the proposed Fire tanks, Pump Room and associated infrastructure is on the
northern side of the Cooyar Street driveway site access.

On attending site, the project design was clearly pegged providing a visual representation of
the proposed design. This essential infrastructure requires the removal of approximately 20
trees of differing species and age class, predominantly Paperbarks and Wattles.

One small Black Sheoak, with a strong lean that appears to be being held up by an adjacent
tree, will be directly conflicted by the design and requires removal.

The closest mature Black Sheoaks are found within the adjacent verge next to the concrete
path, close to the existing Booster. Currently, it is predicted that these trees will be retained
during the project, but when the adjacent trees are removed these two would be left exposed
in an area of considerable change. This change is likely to lead to a decline in the tree’s health
rendering them unsuitable for retention.

In the interest of site accessibility and safety both during and immediately after the completion
of the works, they are recommended for removal as part of these works.




         Figure 8: Fire Tanks and Pump              Figure 9: Bennett and Bennett Tree plot extract




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                             Page 11 of 29

Page 12

    Figure 10: Google Street View 2022 - overview of the site from the road and the location of the existing
    booster (red square) and two Black Sheoaks (marked in light green), and the ‘SITE’ of the Pump Room

While the Water Tank and Pump Room dictates the removal of the trees that are in direct
conflict with the footprint, it is recommended that an additional 1-2m of trees are cleared for
work site access and project constructability. The Project Arborist is to finalise the clearing
limits with Woollam Construction and the location of the Exclusion Zone demarcation.

Inground and pipes and/or services will be exiting the Pump Room towards the main site. The
alignment is shown to be within the existing road which will reduce further tree removals.
Where tree conflict occurs, additional trees will be removed. This is likely to include a few
Paperbarks and an advanced-age Wattle with a major mid-stem union defect. It is proposed
that any tree in direct conflict with the alignment will be removed in consultation with the Project
Arborist. Reduced impact techniques can be used to lessen the conflict on the tree roots with
the aim of retaining suitable trees. This can include localised tunnelling beneath roots and
Hydro Excavation. An Exclusion Zone to protect retained trees will be established and
managed as per Tree Protection Procedures.




 Figure 11: Wattle trees behind existing Booster to be    Figure 12: Yellow line approximate trench location.
                       removed                                    Old Wattle with major union defect.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                     Page 12 of 29

Page 13

The Generator and Switchboard are proposed to be relocated closer to the existing Electrical
Transformer on the western side of the carpark.

On attending site, the project design was clearly pegged providing a visual representation of
the proposed design. The construction of essential infrastructure will require the removal of
approximately 10 trees of differing species and age class. The prominent species are Broad-
leaved Paperbarks and multi-stemmed Wattles, with no Black Sheoaks within the proposed
footprint of the Generator works site.

The closest mature Black Sheoaks are found next to the existing concrete path that runs
between the proposed Generator site and the existing Electrical Transformer. It is likely this
path may require repositioning, and this may impact the adjacent trees. The closest mature
Black Sheoaks are found within the adjacent verge next to the concrete path, close to the
existing Transformer. Currently, it is predicted that these trees will be retained during the
project, but when the adjacent trees are removed these two would be left exposed in an area
of considerable change. This change is likely to lead to a decline in the tree’s health rendering
them unsuitable for retention.

In the interest of site accessibility and safety both during and immediately after the completion
of the works, they are recommended for removal as part of these works. The two Sheoaks are
numbered T20 and T21 in the Bennett and Bennett Tree Plot.




    Figure 13: Generator and Switchboard design     Figure 14: Bennett and Bennett Tree plot extract




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                            Page 13 of 29

Page 14

                              Figure 15: Tree 20 & 21 recommended for removal.
                                     Yellow box – Generator site location




  Figure 16: Overview of the Generator site - yellow box. Existing Transformer - red box. Mature Black Sheoak
                          T20 & T21 - light green. Trees to be removed - red crosses.

It is proposed that all connecting trenching alignments will enter and exit from the carpark side
of the work site.

While the Generator site dictates the removal of the trees in direct conflict with the footprint, it
is recommended that an additional 1-2m of trees are cleared for work site access and project
constructability, this includes trees 20 and 21. The Project Arborist is to finalise the clearing
limits with Woollam Construction and the location of the Exclusion Zone demarcation.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                   Page 14 of 29

Page 15

On the northern to eastern aspect of the site is an existing break in the vegetation that
separates the Girraween Nature Refuge bushland and the site. As part of previous approvals,
Noosa Council gave consent to clear all but the Black Sheoak trees to create a firebreak.
These works were not completed and are now proposed as part of these project works.

A review of the Black Sheoak trees was undertaken as part of this Arborist Assessment. A
separate tree plot plan was provided by Woollam illustrating the Black Sheoaks within the
Firebreak. Table 1 below highlights the observations noted during the site inspection and the
current retention status for these trees. Please note that the number sequencing is not always
continuous, and trees not reflected in the following table are deemed suitable to be retained
at this time.

The status of the remaining young trees at the southern end of the site is questionable. It is
difficult to determine which tree is which on site and their long-term suitability for retention is
questionable with natural fails anticipated in coming years.




           Figure 17: Tree markup plan provided by Woollam illustrating the numbered Black Sheoaks




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                               Page 15 of 29

Page 16

          Figure 18: Tree markup plan provided by Woollam illustrating the numbered Black Sheoaks




                             Figure 19: Tree markup table provided by Woollam




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                              Page 16 of 29

Page 17

 6.3.1 Arborist Review
Tree ID    Condition Comments                                              Retention Status
   1       Failed and resting in adjacent Wattle trees                     Remove
   2       Not identified on site                                          *
   3       Not identified on site                                          *
           Strong phototropic growth habit over the property boundary
   8                                                                       Remove
           and over the roof of the existing building.
           Past side stem failure.
   9       Mature Ganoderma bracket fungi on the main trunk.               Remove
           Unsuitable for retention.
                                                                           Retain.
           Untypical growth habit in the canopy.
                                                                           Prune to improve form
           Will require corrective pruning.
  10                                                                       and structure.
           Tree likely to succumb to localised changes resulting in
                                                                           Monitor monthly during
           canopy decline.
                                                                           the project.
  11       Inside the property boundary next to the boundary peg.          NA / Remove
                                                                           Retain.
  12       Tri stem with strong asymmetrical growth towards the track.     Prune to improve form
                                                                           and structure.
           The tree appears to be recently deceased with foliage turning
                                                                           Reinspect in 1 month.
  13       brown.
                                                                           Removal predicted.
           Low branches over the access track.
                                                                           Design review to
           Semi-mature tree on the edge of a clump, likely conflict with
  22                                                                       confirm removal
           the Access Track works.
                                                                           requirements.
        Large mature tree in average condition.
                                                                           Monitor monthly during
  25    Concerns regarding the tree’s condition once the surrounding
                                                                           the project.
        trees and vegetation are removed.
        Strong asymmetrical growth habit towards the access track.
                                                                           Prune for access.
        Will require 50% canopy removal for access, this will likely
27 & 32                                                                    Monitor monthly during
        have detrimental effects on the tree’s health and long-term
                                                                           the project.
        retention status.
40 & 41 Not identified on site                                             *
  43    Recently failed                                                    Remove
                                                                           Design review to
70 - 72,
           Young Trees with questionable retention                         confirm removal
  79
                                                                           requirements.
 76-78     Not identified on site                                          *
 Table 1: Arborist observations within firebreak




 24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                     Page 17 of 29

Page 18

7 S ITE P HOTOS




   Figure 20: Tree 1             Figure 21: Tree 8    Figure 22: Tree 9




  Figure 23: Tree 10             Figure 24: Tree 11   Figure 25: Tree 12




  Figure 26: Tree 13             Figure 27: Tree 22   Figure 28: Tree 25




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                               Page 18 of 29

Page 19

  Figure 29: Tree 27                          Figure 30: Tree 32                        Figure 31: Tree 43




   Figure 32: Location of trees 40, 41 & 43




                                                               Figure 33 Location of young trees possibly 70-72




     Figure 34: Location of trees 76 - 78




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                  Page 19 of 29

Page 20

8 T REE P ROTECTION G UIDELINES (TPG)
For the proposed retention of the above trees onsite, the following guidelines are
recommended to be implemented to minimise the impact of the Project works. The protection
recommendations offered will be guided by, AS4790 – 2009 Protection of trees on
development sites, industry best practice and the supervising presence of a suitably qualified
and experienced Arborist with a high level of experience as an onsite Project Arborist.

The information within these Guidelines is generic and can be used within the project as
required.

The successful retention of the trees will be bettered by the education and cooperation of all
parties of the construction team during the build and the presence of the Project Arborist on
site to assist and advise during the construction phase for all works carried out adjacent to the
TPZ of protected trees.

ALL workers on the site are to be made aware of the Tree Protection Guidelines and any site-
specific measures by the main contractor prior to commencing works.



An Arboricultural Assessment was undertaken by the Project Arborist for the trees that require
consideration. The information within this Tree Management Plan (TMP) should be read in
conjunction with guidelines laid out in the Australian Standard, AS4970–2009 Protection of
Trees on Development Sites and ongoing advice from the Project Arborist.

A designated onsite foreman/supervisor from the construction company is to liaise with the
Project Arborist to ensure that Tree Protection is adhered to in their absence from the site.

A Post Construction Arborist Report can be prepared by the Project Arborist on request for
the retained tree comprising a Visual Tree Assessment detailing each of the trees’ condition
and vigour, damage or disturbance which may have occurred, and remedial works are
undertaken.

After the final inspection, a Certification of Compliance can be supplied along with any
monitoring documentation as required.

The Project Arborist may at any time implement new or additional procedures as may be
required for the site in the best interest of the trees and the development as a whole.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                       Page 20 of 29

Page 21

The descriptions of the TPZ and SRZ are taken from the Australian Standards, AS 4970-2009
Protection of trees on development sites. These descriptions only give the basic outline to
calculate the TPZ and SRZ, when encroachment or reduction in the size/area of the TPZ is
required to facilitate the development, these can also be calculated: see Appendix D of the
Australian Standard AS 4970-2009.

8.2.1 TPZ
As specified in the Australian Standard, AS 4970-2009, the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) is the
principal means of protecting trees on a development site. The TPZ is a calculation that
combines the root area and crown area which require protection and this area should be
isolated from construction disturbance so that the tree can remain in a viable condition for the
future. The TPZ incorporates the Structural Root Zone (SRZ).

The radius of the TPZ is calculated for each tree by multiplying its DBH (Diameter at Breast
Height - trunk diameter measured at 1.4m above ground) by 12.

E.g., a tree with a .5m diameter at 1.4m x 12 results in a 6m Tree Protection Zone (TPZ).

A TPZ should not be less than 2m or greater than 15m (unless crown protection is required).

8.2.2 SRZ
The Structural Root Zone, as specified in AS 4970-2009 the surface area of protection that is
required around a tree to maintain that tree’s stability – a larger area than this is required to
maintain a tree in a viable condition for the future. It is only necessary to calculate the SRZ
when major encroachment into a TPZ is proposed.

An indicative SRZ radius can be determined from the trunk diameter, D, measured in metres
(above the root buttress) and applying the following formula:
                  0.42
RSRZ = (D x 50)          x 0.64

The SRZ for trees with a trunk diameter less than 0.15m will automatically be 1.5m.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                       Page 21 of 29

Page 22

Figure 35 below shows a typical representation of a tree protection system. Tree’s root
systems are generally shallow with most of the roots found within the top 1m of soil with a
higher density of roots found closest to the surface where moisture and nutrients are more
readily available. The function of the TPZ (Tree Protection Zone) is to ensure that the tree has
a viable root system, so the tree has a functional future as an amenity asset within the
development.

The structural standing of a tree is linked to critical aspects of roots (found in the TPZ) to bind
the soil and create a mass that the tree can anchor to. These roots consist of ‘Secondary roots’
(medium size) and ‘Tertiary roots’ (small size).

Primary roots (large size) found in the SRZ connect the Tree to the anchor system. Primary
roots by themselves do not bind enough soil to create a stable anchor system.

The shallow nature of tree roots should be taken into consideration when working close to
trees and when installing the tree protection fencing for the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ).




                      Figure 35: Example of an ideal generic Tree Protection System



8.3.1 TPZ Signs
The signs, sample to be found at Appendix 2 – Sample TPZ Sign, identifying the TPZ are to
be placed around the edge of the TPZ in locations visible to the site as per Tree Protection
Fencing Standards Australia marketing media AS4970 – 2009.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                        Page 22 of 29

Page 23

8.3.2 Restricted Activities Within the TPZ
Restricted activities within the TPZ / Exclusion Zone that would cause harm to the retained
trees to include, but are not limited to:

   •   Any non-approved construction works.
   •   Any non-approved excavation or cultivation of the ground.
   •   Any non-approved storage.
   •   Preparation of chemicals, including cement products.
   •   Parking of vehicles and plant.
   •   Refuelling.
   •   Dumping of waste.
   •   Wash down and cleaning of equipment.
   •   Placement of Fill.
   •   Lighting fires.
   •   Any non-approved soil level changes.
   •   Temporary or permanent installation of utilities and signs.
   •   Physical damage to the tree.


8.3.3 Tree Protection Fencing (TPF)
The Tree Protection Fencing (TPF) is to be steel mesh panels (as detailed in AS4687-2007
Temporary fencing and hoardings) and held in place with concrete feet, the nut and bolt
holding the clamps are to be secured and tightened with a spanner to prevent the fence from
being easily moved and to restrict access to those with permission only. Shade cloth or
something similar can be attached to the fence to protect the area from airborne matter if
required. Uneven ground and/or exposed sites may require additional staking to hold the
fencing in place. Care is to be taken when installing the additional bracing not to damage tree
roots or hit underground services.

Where the adequate TPZ is not achievable the TPF can be erected in a non-standard
alignment and additional measures including ground protection, e.g., Trak-mats/geo fabric and
mulch to spread the load of site activities and minimise ground disturbance. These measures
will be established between the developer and the Project Arborist.

As an alternative to steel mesh panels for temporary or low access areas, TPZ fencing may
consist of 1m high plastic orange mesh barrier fencing or a double row of flagging with star
pickets with end caps as support, spaced at 4 – 5m and attached with zip ties. This style of
fencing is deemed suitable for larger sites when work activities are generally to be within the
central area of the site with the proposed retained trees on the periphery and away from main
site activities.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                     Page 23 of 29

Page 24

Remediation measures can be undertaken to limit and reduce any negative effects that may
occur. Where suitable the retained trees’ TPZ areas are to be improved to provide a more
favourable and beneficial growing environment for the tree’s roots.

Where the soil levels are required to be raised a sandy loam is to be used. This will improve
drainage and allow for gaseous exchange. Trees can adapt to low levels of Fill being placed
over the existing ground if undertaken with the correct material. In some cases, this additional
medium can also provide ideal rooting conditions for feeder roots and a beneficial food source
for the tree.

The following recommendations could be taken to improve an existing plant’s vigour, and will
in turn benefit the plant’s health, safety, and the amenity that it provides and can be
incorporated with the project landscaping details.

Where groundworks are carried out adjacent to or encroaching into the TPZ areas the
following mitigation measures and procedures should be implemented where deemed
appropriate and should be supervised by Consult Arborist.

•   Where possible the excavated ground, including the cut roots, will be covered/backfilled
    with quality topsoil locally sourced or a sandy loam/river sand with low organic matter, as
    guided by AS 4419—2003. Australian Standard™ Soils for landscaping and garden use.
•   An application of seaweed-based soil conditioner/plant food can be applied to the topsoil
    as per the manufacturer’s guidelines. Monthly applications are recommended for the
    duration of the project.
•   When required supplemental watering with a water cart or sprinkler system can be used
    to retain adequate moisture levels in the soil.
•   The Project Arborist is to advise and oversee all mitigation measure works being
    undertaken on retained trees.

All tree works, and tree protection measures, are to be guided by industry best practices and
the relative Australian Standards which include but are not limited to:
 • Australian Standards AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites
 • Australian Standards AS4373-2007 Pruning of amenity trees




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                      Page 24 of 29

Page 25

9 G ENERAL E XCAVATION M ETHODOLOGIES
Details below give examples of works methodology to excavate a trench or general excavation
when working in proximity to trees.

When using a mechanical excavator ground protection is advisable to minimise compaction
and damage to the surrounding soil and roots. With a combination of a small bucket and ripper,
the spoil from the trench can be carefully extracted. General excavation is to be undertaken,
when possible, with the bucket positioned perpendicular to the tree, and the spoil dug away
from the tree, this helps to minimise roots being accidentally torn or fractured.

When excavations are being undertaken within a tree's root zone, all necessary precautions
are to be adhered to. The Project Arborist will advise on the progression of the works and
undertake root pruning as required.

Roots deemed to be pruned and removed are to be carefully cut using a sharp saw and/or
secateurs. Root removal is carried out by the Project Arborist on a root-by-root basis taking
into consideration the type of tree, distance from the cut to the tree, and the size and number
of roots found.

Where possible trenches and excavations are to be carefully backfilled using topsoil from the
site or imported topsoil with a low organic matter content and lightly compacted by hand within
the tree zone. Ideally, the ground is then irrigated to increase moisture in the soil (not
waterlogged) and where possible 100mm of mulch is spread to cover the surface area.

Where possible create a preliminary trench/excavation at the outer edges of the required cut
line using a Hydro-vacuum excavator. Roots found can be cleanly cut by the Project Arborist.
Once the preliminary cut line is completed excavation of the remaining area outside the cut
line can be dug using the appropriate excavator with all due care and attention to the adjacent
protected trees.




                       Figure 36: Example of preliminary trench/excavation cuts




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                     Page 25 of 29

Page 26

10 H ARD S URFACE / A SPHALT R EMOVAL
The Project will require the removal of the existing path/hard surface adjacent to the retained
subject trees. They will require careful removal overseen by the onsite Project Arborist working
alongside the contractors.

Sections of the old surface can be removed with the use of an excavator whilst positioned and
working away from the tree. Machinery is not to be used on unprotected or bare ground within
the TPZ or Exclusion Zone.

The excavation of any ground within or adjacent to retained trees should be cut
perpendicularly to the tree to reduce the likelihood of roots being split or damaged
longitudinally and is to be overseen by the Project Arborist.

If roots are uncovered and determined to be cut, sharp handsaw or secateurs are to be used
to ensure a clean cut at a right angle to minimise the cut surface area. On completion of the
demolition works any exposed roots are to be covered with either damp hessian or sandy loam
to protect the roots from drying out before the construction of the new surface.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                      Page 26 of 29

Page 27

11 R EFERENCES :
•     the Australian Standards AS4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites (2009).
•     Australian Standards AS 4373 – 2007 Pruning of amenity trees. (2007).
•     Barton, A. (2003). Wild plants of greater Brisbane. South Brisbane, Qld, Australia: Published by the Queensland Museum,
      in partnership with the Environment and Parks Branch of the Brisbane City Council.
•     Dunster, J., Smiley, E., Matheny, N. and Lilly, S. (n.d.). Tree risk assessment manual.
•     Haslam, S. and Hauser, J. (2011). Noosa's native plants. Tewantin (Qld.): Noosa Integrated Catchment Assoc. Inc.
•     Hayes, E. (2001). Evaluating tree defects. [S.l.]: Safetrees.
•     Lonsdale, D. (1999). Principles of tree hazard assessment and management. London: Forso as estry Commission.
•     Mattheck, C., Breloer, H., Lonsdale, D. and Strouts, R. (2003). The body language of trees. London: The Stationery Office.
•     Strouts, R. and Winter, T. (1998). Diagnosis of ill-health in trees. Colegate, Norwich: Crown.
•     IACA, 2010, IACA Significance of a Tree, Assessment Rating System (STARS), Institute of Australian Consulting
      Arboriculturists, Australia, www.iaca.org.au


12 A SSUMPTIONS AND D ISCLAIMERS
This information contained in this report has been prepared on an independent basis, free of any bias and represents the honest
opinion of the consulting arborist.

All data is based on a visual inspection of the tree/s and its/their location at the time of writing, unless otherwise stated, and
contains opinions, advice and recommendations based on information and data gathered from site inspections carried out by the
author and information supplied by the Client (Woollam Construction Pty Ltd).

All information received from the Client shall be deemed to be true, accurate and up to date.

To the extent permitted by law, you agree Consult Arborist Pty Ltd is not liable to you or any person or entity for any loss of or
damage caused or alleged to have been caused (including loss or damage resulting from negligence) either directly or indirectly,
by your use of the information made available in this report. In no event will the author be liable to you for any lost revenue or
profits, or for special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damage (however caused and regardless of the theory of liability)
arising out of or related to your use of that information, even if the author has been advised of the possibility of such a loss or
damage.

Consult Arborist cannot be held responsible for the effects of non-conformance works performed, by unsuitably qualified staff or
without the supervision of Consult Arborist.

Unless otherwise stated this report cannot be used within a court of law or any legal situation without the prior consent of Consult
Arborist Pty Ltd. The author shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent
contractual arrangements have been made.

The information contained in this report refers only to the tree/s that were inspected in July 2024 and reflects the condition of the
tree/s at the time of the inspection.

There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that the problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question
may not arise in the future. Likewise, remedial treatments cannot be guaranteed.

Arboriculturalists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living
organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Consult
Arborist Pty Ltd and the author cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified
period of time.

This report does not take into consideration the possibility of extreme weather or other events over which Consult Arborist Pty
Ltd has no control.

Treatment, pruning and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the Arboriculturalists services, such as
property boundaries and ownership, disputes between neighbours, sightlines, landlord-tenant matters and related. Consult
Arborist Pty Ltd cannot take such issues into account unless the complete and accurate information is given to them. Likewise,
Consult Arborist Pty Ltd cannot accept any responsibility for the authorization or non-authorization of any recommended treatment
or remedial measure.

Arboriculturalists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend
measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Trees can be managed,
but they cannot be controlled. To live or work near a tree involves some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks
associated with a tree is to eliminate the tree.

Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of Consult Arborist Pty Ltd or to seek additional advice.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                                      Page 27 of 29

Page 28

A PPENDIX 1: D EFINITION OF T ERMS
 Age Class (AC):
 Y           Young: Early stage of growth, immature size
 EM          Early Mature: Fast-growing well-established tree which has not yet, reached mature size
 M           Mature: The tree reached its mature size, and exhibits slowing growth rates with early stages of naturally forming
             dead or dysfunctional wood.
 OM          Over Mature: The tree has reached mature size and is unlike to increase significantly in height or mass.
             Retrenchment of the upper crown with increased vegetative vitality in the lower crown, increased fungal activity
             and wood decay, and increased colonisation by flora and fauna.
 V:          Veteran: Tree with advanced retrenchment, reduced crown size and annual increment growth, extensive hollowing,
             crown collapse, low vigour, advanced heartwood decay, advanced colonisation by fauna and flora.
 Health (H):
 GH          Good: Tree with no defects or disorders which are notable. Full canopy with good colour foliage. Minimal pathogen
             damage.
 FH          Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Some dead wood within what can be an unbalanced
             canopy, foliage generally with good colour although some discolouration may be present typical of species in
             location. Minor pathogen damage.
 PH          Poor: Tree with major defects or disorders which are notable. The tree has considerable deadwood present, and
             discoloured or distorted leaves indicating a further decline of the tree. Detrimental pathogen damage.
 D           Dead or dysfunctional moribund tree.
 Structure (St):
 GS          Good: Tree with good unions and no branch defects. Sound trunk with no / minor defects. Good buttress and root
             structure.
 FS          Fair: Tree with minor defects or disorders which are notable. Small areas of bark missing. Small cavities or minor
             unfavourable branch unions may be present. Minor damage to roots.
 PS          Poor: Tree with major defects, large hollows, weak unions and/or problematic damaged roots.
 HS          Hazardous: This implies a tree with a major defect that may fail at any time.
 Abbreviations:
 Ht          Height
 CS          Crown Spread
 DBH         Diameter at Breast Height - The approximate diameter of the trunk measured visually in millimetres or meters at a
             height of 1.4m.
 TPZ         The Tree Protection Zone, as per AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, is the principal means
             of protecting trees on a development site. The TPZ is a combination of the root and crown area requiring protection
             to be isolated from construction disturbance so that the tree can remain in a viable condition. The TPZ incorporates
             the Structural Root Zone (SRZ).
             The radius of the TPZ = DBH x 12
             A TPZ should not be less than 2m or greater than 15m (unless crown protection is required).
 SRZ         The Structural Root Zone, as per AS 4970-2009 Protection of trees on development sites, is a mathematical
             calculation of the surface area of protection required to maintain a tree’s stability – a larger area is required to
             maintain a tree in viable health. It is only necessary to calculate the SRZ when a major encroachment into a TPZ
             is proposed.
 Recommended Works:
 Aerial Inspection:       Assessment is to be carried out either by Consult Arborist or a Qualified Arborist contractor to assess
                          defects within the canopy and report findings.
 Canopy                   A combination of removing dead wood and selective pruning to benefit the tree’s future health and
 management:              canopy structure. The end-weight reduction of longer lateral branches, with the creation of future
                          growth points to sustain canopy growth and assist with natural canopy retrenchment.
 Deadwood and detail Remove deadwood (>40mm in diameter and/or 1m in length), and dysfunctional, damaged, and weak
                          branches from the tree’s canopy.
 End-weight               Trimming of the concentration of excessive wood and foliage weight towards the extremity of the
 reduction:               branch to lessen the overall load and branch failure potential.
 Mulch:                   The application of a layer of woodchip/forest mulch approximately 50-75 mm thick to the canopy drip
                          line where possible, leaving a small well around the base of the tree trunk.
 Palm clean                Remove dead / dying fronds and seed pods or nuts.
 Proactive removal        To prevent future anticipated issues, remove the tree and replant with a more suitable species for the
                          location.
 Prune away from Prune branches to reduce the encroachment and weight of the branches growing towards the adjacent
 adjacent dwelling.       dwelling/building.
 Reduce and retain        Reduce the tree to a safe height and size to limit hazards while retaining the remainder for habitat.
 Reinspect                A repeat assessment is recommended to be carried out 12 months from the date of this assessment
                          or after any major weather event.
 Selective pruning        Prune selective / identified branches to reduce end weight/length.
 Soil/Plant Care          Apply organic compost around the base of each tree 20-30mm thick, leaving a small well around the
                          base of the tree trunk. Additional seaweed-based plant food/soil conditioners applied as per the
                          manufacturers’ guidelines and will help to improve soil biology and maintain the tree’s health.
 Stump grind              Remove the stump by grinding to approximately 100mm below the surrounding ground level when
                          located within mown grass or damaging infrastructure.




24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1                                                                                   Page 28 of 29

Page 29

( onsult \rborist

APPENDIX 2: SAMPLE TPZ FENCING SIGN

 

onsult

rborist

Today's trees for tomorrow

Tree Protection Zone

N@

ACCESS

Tree Protection Measures are in place as per AS 4970-2009:

 

 

No unauthorised entry of persons or plant for any reason.
No works of storage in or near this zone.
This tree protection barrier should remain in good condition and must not be
altered or removed.
« Refer to the Arborist Reports for more details.

Australian Standards, AS 4970-2009, Protection of trees on development sites

For more information contact:
Phone:

 

 

 

 

 

 

24_07_16_TMP_Woollam_Ozcare_V1 Page 29 of 29

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.