Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0056 Information Request
MCU14/0056
26 Provide a preliminary geometric design for the proposed site access intersection
taking account of the existing intersections north and south of the proposed Myall
Street site access intersection.
27 Confirm that SIDRA default values have been used, or justify any alternative gap
acceptance (or other) parameters used in analysis.
28 Provide SIDRA (lane) output tables for the proposed site access intersection in the
same format as those in Appendix “C” of the Pekol Traffic and Transport report.
29 Provide strategy and details of pedestrian and bicycle access to the site (particularly
to the proposed food store the fast food outlet) and including end of trip facilities and
taking into account of the nearby high school, and any other potential local
generators.
30 Provide a plan indicating the proposed pedestrian and bicycle pathways/movement
network within and around the site.
ECOLOGY
Issue – Fauna Survey
Appendix D of the submitted Ecological Assessment Report states the Report has been
prepared in accordance with Planning Scheme Policy 18 - Ecological Assessment
Guidelines. No fauna survey results are presented in the application material.
Information Required
31 Provide evidence of the fauna survey in accordance with Table 7.1 of Planning
Scheme Policy 18- Ecological Assessment Guidelines.
Issue – Riparian Buffer
The submitted Ecological Assessment Report does not adequately address the Specific
Outcomes of the Biodiversity Overlay for the Riparian Buffer Area on the site.
Information Required
32 Provide an assessment of the proposal with relation to each of the Riparian Buffer
Area Outcome 5 specific outcomes, in particular
(a) How the proposal protects riparian zones by avoiding any new development
in the riparian buffer area
(b) How the proposal protects riparian zones by retaining aquatic and terrestrial
habitats in riparian zones
(c) How the proposal protects riparian zones by maintaining wildlife corridors
along watercourses and drainage lines for native fauna movement
(d) How the proposal protects riparian zones by avoiding edge effects and
incompatible uses in riparian zones
(e) How the proposal protects riparian zones by maintaining bank stability by
minimizing bank erosion and slumping
(f) How the proposal protects riparian zones by maintaining water quality by
filtering sediments, nutrients and other pollutants
(g) How the proposal protects riparian zones by removing undesirable plant
species and replacing them with vegetation of local origin;
Page 6 of 12
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.