Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU14/0056 Information Request

of 12

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                   MCU14/0056



26     Provide a preliminary geometric design for the proposed site access intersection
       taking account of the existing intersections north and south of the proposed Myall
       Street site access intersection.

27     Confirm that SIDRA default values have been used, or justify any alternative gap
       acceptance (or other) parameters used in analysis.
28     Provide SIDRA (lane) output tables for the proposed site access intersection in the
       same format as those in Appendix “C” of the Pekol Traffic and Transport report.

29     Provide strategy and details of pedestrian and bicycle access to the site (particularly
       to the proposed food store the fast food outlet) and including end of trip facilities and
       taking into account of the nearby high school, and any other potential local
       generators.

30     Provide a plan indicating the proposed pedestrian and bicycle pathways/movement
       network within and around the site.

ECOLOGY

Issue – Fauna Survey
Appendix D of the submitted Ecological Assessment Report states the Report has been
prepared in accordance with Planning Scheme Policy 18 - Ecological Assessment
Guidelines. No fauna survey results are presented in the application material.

Information Required
31     Provide evidence of the fauna survey in accordance with Table 7.1 of Planning
       Scheme Policy 18- Ecological Assessment Guidelines.

Issue – Riparian Buffer
The submitted Ecological Assessment Report does not adequately address the Specific
Outcomes of the Biodiversity Overlay for the Riparian Buffer Area on the site.

Information Required
32     Provide an assessment of the proposal with relation to each of the Riparian Buffer
       Area Outcome 5 specific outcomes, in particular
       (a)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by avoiding any new development
              in the riparian buffer area
       (b)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by retaining aquatic and terrestrial
              habitats in riparian zones
       (c)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by maintaining wildlife corridors
              along watercourses and drainage lines for native fauna movement
       (d)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by avoiding edge effects and
              incompatible uses in riparian zones
       (e)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by maintaining bank stability by
              minimizing bank erosion and slumping
       (f)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by maintaining water quality by
              filtering sediments, nutrients and other pollutants
       (g)    How the proposal protects riparian zones by removing undesirable plant
              species and replacing them with vegetation of local origin;




                                                                                   Page 6 of 12
Log in to download the original file

MCU14_0056 Information Request.pdf · 95 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.