Original source · versioned page text
2015-04-07 Item 2 - Attachment 1 - Pre feasibility Study of Electric Bus Routes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Over the investment horizon of 15 years, the total NPC discounted costs for the Optare
electric bus came to an estimated -$624,849 and -$1,074,230 for BYD. The total NPC
discounted cost per kilometre came to -$0.33 for Optare and -$0.56 for BYD, respectively.
The cost analysis indicates that the Optare solution to be lower from a total NPC
discounted cost and cost per kilometre standpoint. This outcome is due mainly to the
extended operational life of the Optare with a stated operational life of 25 years as against
the BYD at 15 years.
Operational model results
The operational model shows discounted fuel savings of $269,866 and $214,049 for Optare
and BYD fleet deployment over the standard Sunbus diesel fleet for the 10 year leasing
period. However, these savings were not sufficient to offset the additional operational
costs incurred in deployment of electric buses on Route 627. The charging and
scheduling limitations of the electric buses – requiring an additional bus to be run on the
route – make electric bus deployment an expensive option.
The review of relevant State and Federal Transport policy, standards and regulations which
will may potentially influence the project yielded the following:
As yet there are no specific standards regulating the use of electric buses
Specific requirements for electric buses were not identified in the review of current
legislation and regulations
Queensland 30-year Electricity Strategy (2012) identified the need for efficient regulatory
frameworks to create efficient supply chains that accommodate innovative technology,
such as embedded generation technology, battery storage and electric vehicles. It also
discussed the need for addressing the impact that electric vehicles have on network
infrastructure
Electric bus for the trial will need to comply with all State and Commonwealth government
laws in in particular the Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport (DSAPT)
2002, Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act 2002 (DDA) and Australian Design
Rules (ADR)
Qld Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) - need to satisfy any performance
levels outlined in a services contract as per Chapter 6 of the Transport Operations
(Passenger Transport) Act 1994
Bus operators must ensure that their drivers are provided with appropriate training to
operate an electric bus. The intent of the training would be to ensure drivers could
operate the vehicle in a safe manner
Identified risks for the project include:
New technology - The introduction of an electric bus brings higher degrees of technical
and financial uncertainty due to higher up front capital costs combined with the
implementation of new technologies
Uncertainty surrounding battery life and the performance
Uncertainty surrounding “real-world” performance outcomes during the trial given location
specific variations in ambient temperatures, braking intensity, and accommodation of air-
conditioning load
Uncertainty surrounding the GHG performance of electric vehicles when powered using
electricity generated by non-renewable energy sources
GHD | Feasibility Study of Electric Bus Routes in Noosa - Planning Report | 59
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.